← Teams

THPRD-Swartley/Strange

2022 Adult 40 & Over · 4.0 Women

8 players · average NTRP 3.88 · USTA/PACIFIC NW / NORTHERN OREGON

View scouting list →
Scouting

Roster averages 3.53 estimated across 8 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.75
Jin Velasco
usually #1 Doubles 44%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.72
Christy Strange
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.70
Mary Klinger
usually #2 Doubles 63%, also #1 Doubles 38% · published 4
3.56
Gabriela McIntosh
usually #1 Doubles 57%, also #3 Doubles 43% · published 4
3.54
Leah Buxman
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.52
Melissa Light
usually #3 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 4
3.37
Gina Ossanna
usually #1 Singles 56%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.07
Elizabeth Schwarz
usually #3 Doubles 80%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published 3.5
Results8 ties
2022-06-11Won 3–0
W#1 DoublesLeah Buxman / Kirsten Holmes vs Kelly Asbridge / Trylla Lembke6-2, 6-4
W#2 DoublesSara van Beckum / Jin Velasco vs Susan Agee / Pamela Meiling6-1, 6-4
W#3 DoublesCourtney Storrs / Christy Strange vs Sue Edmonds / Jill Derry6-4, 6-3
2022-06-05Won 2–1
W#1 DoublesLeah Buxman / Mary Klinger vs Kathleen Budnick / Judith Kobin6-2, 6-3
L#2 DoublesKatie Windsor / Melissa Light vs Sherri Sacconaghi / Brooke Moffenbeier7-5, 7-6
W#3 DoublesSara van Beckum / Jin Velasco vs Nancy Atkins / Karen McNairy6-3, 7-5
2022-05-22Lost 0–1
L#3 DoublesGina Ossanna / Elizabeth Schwarz vs Jennie Brawn / Elda Nelson7-6, 6-1
2022-05-15Lost 0–4
L#1 DoublesLeah Buxman / Mary Klinger vs Valyrie Ingram / Molly Shum6-4, 6-3
L#1 SinglesGina Ossanna vs Bo Yu6-0, 6-4
L#2 DoublesJin Velasco / Courtney Storrs vs Kristin Spear / Kristie Leake6-2, 6-4
L#3 DoublesGabriela McIntosh / Elizabeth Schwarz vs Diane Pittmon / Sharon Kim-Geib6-3, 6-1
2022-05-08Split 1–1
L#1 DoublesLeah Buxman / Christy Strange vs Catherine Go / Linda Lovett6-2, 4-6, 1-0
W#2 DoublesMary Klinger / Sara van Beckum vs Sheila Anderson / Courtney Pierce4-6, 6-4, 1-0
2022-04-30Won 2–0
W#1 DoublesLeah Buxman / Mary Klinger vs Michelle Beilstein / Karen Ohollaren6-2, 6-1
W#3 DoublesMelissa Light / KEELEY PLOMBON vs Michelle Dombek / Gina Meyer6-0, 6-2
2022-04-17Lost 0–4
L#1 DoublesLeah Buxman / Sara van Beckum vs Donna Kennish / Kelly Mohr7-6, 6-1
L#1 SinglesGina Ossanna vs Hong Jones6-2, 4-6, 1-0
L#2 DoublesMary Klinger / Courtney Storrs vs Karen Dellinger / Angie Lee6-2, 7-5
L#3 DoublesMelissa Light / Jin Velasco vs Flor Harrigan / Rie Sasakawa7-5, 6-4
2022-04-08Split 1–1
W#1 DoublesChristy Strange / Jin Velasco vs Claire Thayer / Dalika Crawford6-3, 6-2
L#3 DoublesGabriela McIntosh / Melissa Light vs Erika Finrow / Robby Lafleur1-6, 6-4, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits.

4
Jin Velasco
69W–35L career
6%91%4%
3.75
4
Christy Strange
89W–67L career
1%98%0%
3.72
4
Mary Klinger
221W–142L career
2%98%0%
3.70
4
Gabriela McIntosh
111W–90L career
18%82%0%
3.56
4
Leah Buxman
113W–106L career
23%77%0%
3.54
4
Melissa Light
38W–69L career
32%68%0%
3.52
3.5
Gina Ossanna
33W–61L career
0%92%7%
3.37
3.5
Elizabeth Schwarz
49W–46L career
17%83%0%
3.07

Three percentages are the year-end projection — chance of moving down, staying, moving up — and the number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.