Teams

PW.Kupfrian

2024 CTRL Combo Doubles 18 & Over · Combo 18 & Over 2.5 Women

11 players · average NTRP 2.86 / NORTH CAROLINA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule5 played
2024-09-26Won 10
W#1 DoublesAmy Dexheimer / Leslie Singer vs N/A6-0, 6-0
2024-09-19Won 10
W#3 DoublesAmy Dexheimer / Julie Ley vs N/A6-0, 6-0
2024-09-12vs LOCH.CockayneWon 10
W#3 DoublesLindsay Rigney / Julie Ley vs Laura Petroski / Maria Pickering4-6, 6-4, 1-0
2024-08-29vs BENT.WagnerSplit 11
W#2 DoublesLindsay Rigney / Kristin Comer vs Mary Jo Ford / Amy Alford4-6, 6-3, 1-0
L#3 DoublesLisa Bradley / Amy Dexheimer vs Megan Wagner / Alejandra Monsalve1-6, 2-6
2024-08-15Won 10
W#2 DoublesCassidy Jacobsen / Lindsay Rigney vs Maki Ishizaka / Manami Ohashi6-1, 6-2
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Combo 18 & Over 2.5 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.66 estimated across 10 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.47
Irina Comer
published
3.00
Kristen Bostian
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.90
Allison Kupfrian
usually #1 Doubles 63%, also #2 Doubles 38% · published 3
2.83
Cassidy Jacobsen
published 3
2.83
Jamie Maness
usually #3 Doubles 43%, also #2 Doubles 43% · published 3
2.66
Kristin Comer
published
2.60
Andrea Agee
usually #2 Doubles 57%, also #3 Doubles 29% · published 3
2.27
Lindsay Rigney
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 2.5
2.04
Lisa Bradley
published
2.02
Amy Dexheimer
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 2.5
Julie Ley
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Allison Kupfrian + Andrea Agee3443% gamesnot enough data
Allison Kupfrian + Kristen Bostian303 matchesnot enough data
Lindsay Rigney + Andrea Agee213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Irina Comer
11W–9L career · no lines in 2024
<1%58%42%
3.47
3
Kristen Bostian
43W–28L career · 5 lines in 2024
<1%51%49%
3.00
3
Allison Kupfrian
88W–70L career · 8 lines in 2024
<1%75%24%
2.90
3
Cassidy Jacobsen
5W–1L career · no lines in 2024
1%88%11%
2.83
3
Jamie Maness
34W–29L career · 7 lines in 2024
1%88%11%
2.83
Kristin Comer
8W–12L career · no lines in 2024
13%86%1%
2.66
3
Andrea Agee
46W–81L career · type A · 7 lines in 2024
25%75%<1%
2.60
2.5
Lindsay Rigney
26W–36L career · 3 lines in 2024
0%95%5%
2.27
Lisa Bradley
1W–12L career · no lines in 2024
0%>99%<1%
2.04
2.5
Amy Dexheimer
21W–73L career · 3 lines in 2024
0%>99%<1%
2.02
Julie Ley
0W–1L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.