Teams

Escambia/Tran/18&Over7.0MXD

2024 Escambia Mixed 18 & Over · 7.0 Mixed 18 & Over

13 players · average NTRP 3.67 / REGION_1

View scouting list →
Schedule4 played
2024-07-31vs Wilson - PCCWon 10
W#2 DoublesKen McCurdy / Melanie Bell vs Fletcher Wilson / Sandra Wilson6-0, 6-2
2024-07-10vs Wallace - RS ClayWon 10
W#2 DoublesRobert Fabbro / Lauren Anderson vs Andrew Hillman / Susan Bonsignore6-2, 6-3
2024-07-02vs Abel - RS ClaySplit 11
L#2 DoublesNick Farkas / Melanie Bell vs Rene Abel / James Richardson3-6, 7-5, 0-1
W#3 DoublesRobert Fabbro / Denise Wilson vs Gregory Gill / Thuy Nguyen6-2, 7-5
2024-06-26vs Schweigert - PCCWon 20
W#1 DoublesRobert Fabbro / Lauren Anderson vs Brian Weil / Pressly Weil6-1, 7-5
W#3 DoublesNick Farkas / Melanie Bell vs Charlie Culpepper / Paige Davis6-1, 5-7, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 7.0 Mixed 18 & Over have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.46 estimated across 12 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.90
Colton Wilson
published 4
3.85
Kyle Wilson
published
3.80
Robert Fabbro
usually #3 Doubles 42%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
3.67
Ken McCurdy
published
3.63
KIMBERLY ANDREWS
published
3.60
Ryan Elliott
published
3.53
Nick Farkas
published
3.29
Melanie Bell
usually #2 Doubles 40%, also #3 Doubles 40% · published
3.28
Wade Wilson
published
3.20
Denise Wilson
published 3.5
3.15
Clay Anderson
published 3.5
2.62
Jaymes Tran
published
Emily Ioakim
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Wade Wilson + Denise Wilson7256% games+2.1% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Colton Wilson
9W–4L career · no lines in 2024
<1%77%23%
3.90
Kyle Wilson
9W–2L career · no lines in 2024
1%85%15%
3.85
Robert Fabbro
143W–78L career · 12 lines in 2024
2%91%8%
3.80
Ken McCurdy
18W–15L career · no lines in 2024
11%88%1%
3.67
KIMBERLY ANDREWS
4W–7L career · no lines in 2024
18%81%<1%
3.63
Ryan Elliott
2W–9L career · no lines in 2024
24%76%<1%
3.60
Nick Farkas
47W–20L career · no lines in 2024
<1%42%58%
3.53
Melanie Bell
39W–28L career · 10 lines in 2024
2%91%7%
3.29
Wade Wilson
24W–22L career · no lines in 2024
2%92%6%
3.28
3.5
Denise Wilson
13W–11L career · no lines in 2024
7%91%2%
3.20
3.5
Clay Anderson
32W–19L career · no lines in 2024
15%85%1%
3.15
Jaymes Tran
2W–5L career · no lines in 2024
20%79%<1%
2.62
Emily Ioakim
2W–0L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.