Teams

RCCB - Vickers

2026 Brevard Adult 40 & Over · 3.5 Adult 40 & Over - Women

10 players · average NTRP 3.42 / REGION_4

View scouting list →
Schedule4 played
2026-03-02vs Fee - BaylenWon 31
W#1 DoublesCatherine Grainger / Sue Lutter vs Lynda Rippolone / Kimberly Lyons6-2, 6-1
L#1 SinglesMelissa Vickers vs Elia Twigg3-6, 3-6
W#2 DoublesDEE MANUEL / Diana Hayslip vs Cynthia Kenemuth / Verna Baylen6-3, 6-0
W#3 DoublesTinara Choing / Michele Heyn vs N/A6-0, 6-0
2026-02-09vs Brevard/RuetherSplit 22
W#1 DoublesMichele Heyn / Megan Holthaus vs Danielle Hyatt / Elizabeth Shannon1-6, 7-6, 1-0
L#1 SinglesAngela Duckworth vs Edie Newell6-4, 1-6, 0-1
L#2 DoublesTinara Choing / DEE MANUEL vs Lyuda Saks / Sarah Hirji2-6, 7-5, 0-1
W#3 DoublesSue Lutter / Brittany Reiter vs Michelle Ruether / Dana Saunders7-6, 3-6, 1-0
2026-01-26vs Suntree - PassmoreLost 01
L#1 DoublesMichele Heyn / Sue Lutter vs Lee Harrington / SARA BRESETTE2-6, 7-5, 0-1
2026-01-12vs Kiwi - RamseySplit 22
W#1 DoublesSue Lutter / Michele Heyn vs Maria Diegnan / Anne Ramsey6-1, 6-4
L#1 SinglesMelissa Vickers vs Heather Boesch5-7, 3-6
W#2 DoublesCatherine Grainger / DEE MANUEL vs Tina Murphy / Barbara Burgess6-4, 5-7, 1-0
L#3 DoublesBrittany Reiter / Diana Hayslip vs Tracy Famiano / Wendy Watson6-7, 4-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 3.5 Adult 40 & Over - Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.18 estimated across 10 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.47
Angela Duckworth
usually #1 Singles 100% · published 3.5
3.41
Michele Heyn
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
3.23
DEE MANUEL
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.23
Catherine Grainger
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
3.20
Sue Lutter
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
3.20
Diana Hayslip
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
3.20
Tinara Choing
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.01
Brittany Reiter
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.94
Melissa Vickers
usually #1 Singles 100% · published
2.87
Megan Holthaus
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Brittany Reiter + Megan Holthaus134 matchesnot enough data
Megan Holthaus + Diana Hayslip303 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Angela Duckworth
8W–3L career · 1 line in 2026
<1%58%42%
3.47
3.5
Michele Heyn
109W–104L career · 4 lines in 2026
<1%73%27%
3.41
3.5
DEE MANUEL
11W–4L career · 3 lines in 2026
5%92%3%
3.23
3.5
Catherine Grainger
4W–7L career · 2 lines in 2026
5%92%3%
3.23
Sue Lutter
20W–6L career · 3 lines in 2026
<1%8%92%
3.20
3.5
Diana Hayslip
10W–8L career · 2 lines in 2026
8%91%2%
3.20
Tinara Choing
1W–9L career · 1 line in 2026
8%90%1%
3.20
3
Brittany Reiter
11W–15L career · 2 lines in 2026
<1%46%54%
3.01
Melissa Vickers
20W–13L career · 2 lines in 2026
<1%65%35%
2.94
Megan Holthaus
7W–9L career · 1 line in 2026
<1%81%18%
2.87

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.