Teams

Mike's 6.0 #1

2024 Mixed 18 and Over League · 6.0

15 players · average NTRP 3.00 / MAUI

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2024-04-14vs Mike's 6.0 #2Lost 03
L#1 DoublesSusan Fazekas / Fritz Schneider vs Jennifer Kelley / Jonathan Lau2-6, 6-3, 0-1
L#2 DoublesTricia Kezeli / Steve Ulene vs Elizabeth Lofaro / Michael Singlehurst6-7, 6-2, 0-1
L#3 DoublesBless Young / Jose Lazo vs Mickey Haller / Milton Matsuoka4-6, 1-6
2024-04-07vs Mike's 6.0 #2Split 11
W#1 DoublesRosemary Bachaus / Fritz Schneider vs Corinne Tanabe / Milton Matsuoka6-3, 6-1
L#2 DoublesSusan Fazekas / Monty Tester vs Lisa Paulson / Michael Singlehurst3-6, 4-6
2024-04-06vs Mike's 6.0 #2Lost 03
L#1 DoublesTricia Kezeli / Thomas Liu vs Pearl Rockett / Gerald Kalua4-6, 4-6
L#2 DoublesBless Young / Arnold Wunder vs Mickey Haller / Kevin Madaya6-4, 1-6, 0-1
L#3 DoublesColleen McKenna / Jose Lazo vs Melanie Devereux / Michael Singlehurst2-6, 1-6
2024-03-31vs Mike's 6.0 #2Won 30
W#1 DoublesRosemary Bachaus / Steve Ulene vs Pearl Rockett / Carl Bertelmann6-0, 6-1
W#2 DoublesTricia Kezeli / Thomas Liu vs Corinne Tanabe / Milton Matsuoka4-6, 6-4
W#3 DoublesJane Sakakihara / Fritz Schneider vs N/A6-0, 6-0
2024-03-30vs Mike's 6.0 #2Lost 02
L#1 DoublesJane Sakakihara / Monty Tester vs Pearl Rockett / Kevin Madaya6-4, 4-6, 0-1
L#2 DoublesTricia Kezeli / Arnold Wunder vs Elizabeth Lofaro / Gerald Kalua6-4, 3-6, 1-0
2024-03-24vs Mike's 6.0 #2Won 21
W#1 DoublesTricia Kezeli / Thomas Liu vs Elizabeth Lofaro / Jonathan Lau7-6, 6-4
W#2 DoublesRachael Barnard / Monty Tester vs Lisa Paulson / Michael Singlehurst6-4, 6-1
L#3 DoublesBless Young / Jose Lazo vs Corinne Tanabe / Milton Matsuoka4-6, 1-6
2024-03-16vs Mike's 6.0 #2Lost 03
L#1 DoublesRosemary Bachaus / Thomas Liu vs Pearl Rockett / Gerald Kalua6-4, 3-6, 1-0
L#2 DoublesTricia Kezeli / Monty Tester vs Corinne Tanabe / Kevin Madaya4-6, 0-6
L#3 DoublesColleen McKenna / Arnold Wunder vs Lisa Paulson / Carl Bertelmann1-6, 1-6
2024-03-10vs Mike's 6.0 #2Won 30
W#1 DoublesRachael Barnard / Steve Ulene vs Jennifer Kelley / Jonathan Lau6-2, 6-7, 1-0
W#2 DoublesSusan Fazekas / Nathan McFarland vs Mickey Haller / Michael Singlehurst6-4, 6-1
W#3 DoublesJane Sakakihara / Fritz Schneider vs Melanie Devereux / Milton Matsuoka6-0, 6-3
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 6.0 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.79 estimated across 9 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.27
Nathan McFarland
usually #2 Doubles 80%, also #3 Doubles 20% · published 3
3.04
Steve Ulene
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
2.93
Tricia Kezeli
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 3
2.87
Monty Tester
usually #2 Doubles 75%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published 3
2.82
Jane Sakakihara
usually #3 Doubles 75%, also #1 Doubles 13% · published 3
2.82
Rachael Barnard
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 3
Bless Young
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3
2.50
Colleen McKenna
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.49
Arnold Wunder
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 2.5
2.32
Susan Fazekas
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
Fritz Schneider
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
Jose Lazo
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Michael Kinoshita
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
Rosemary Bachaus
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Thomas Liu
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Tricia Kezeli + Thomas Liu4449% games−4.2% vs expected
Monty Tester + Tricia Kezeli5162% gamesnot enough data
Jane Sakakihara + Arnold Wunder4162% gamesnot enough data
Tricia Kezeli + Arnold Wunder1454% gamesnot enough data
Tricia Kezeli + Steve Ulene1450% gamesnot enough data
Jane Sakakihara + Steve Ulene224 matchesnot enough data
Jane Sakakihara + Monty Tester213 matchesnot enough data
Monty Tester + Rosemary Bachaus213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3
Nathan McFarland
62W–23L career · 5 lines in 2024
<1%3%97%
3.27
3.5
Steve Ulene
69W–58L career · 6 lines in 2024
38%62%<1%
3.04
3
Tricia Kezeli
68W–97L career · 6 lines in 2024
<1%68%32%
2.93
3
Monty Tester
84W–86L career · 4 lines in 2024
<1%82%18%
2.87
3
Jane Sakakihara
122W–185L career · 8 lines in 2024
1%89%10%
2.82
3
Rachael Barnard
45W–57L career · 2 lines in 2024
1%89%10%
2.82
3
Bless Young
11W–44L career · 3 lines in 2024
not enough data
3
Colleen McKenna
6W–14L career · 2 lines in 2024
50%50%<1%
2.50
2.5
Arnold Wunder
20W–51L career · type M · 3 lines in 2024
0%53%47%
2.49
Susan Fazekas
16W–31L career · 3 lines in 2024
0%90%10%
2.32
Fritz Schneider
4W–5L career · 3 lines in 2024
not enough data
Jose Lazo
7W–18L career · 3 lines in 2024
not enough data
Michael Kinoshita
29W–56L career · 2 lines in 2024
not enough data
Rosemary Bachaus
53W–33L career · 3 lines in 2024
not enough data
Thomas Liu
32W–39L career · 4 lines in 2024
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.