Teams

NewEngland/Anastas/65&Over6.0M

2024 ECT Adult 65 & Over Men · 6.0 Men 1

13 players · average NTRP 3.12 / SOUTHERN CONNECTICUT

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule4 played
2024-08-03vs RP:RP65:LevesqueWon 30
W#1 DoublesSteven Johnson / Peter Anastas vs Ray Pezza / Bruce Kolovson6-4, 7-5
W#2 DoublesRico Mastronunzio / James Hawxhurst vs Joseph Pezza / Harvey Alberg6-0, 6-2
W#3 DoublesTom Lee / William Faye vs Gerald Levesque / Richard Mable6-0, 7-5
2024-08-03vs RP:RP65:LevesqueWon 30
W#1 DoublesEARL Smith / Kevin Hotary vs Ray Pezza / Bruce Kolovson6-0, 6-2
W#2 DoublesPaul Raimondi / Rico Mastronunzio vs Richard McCahey / Joseph Pezza6-1, 6-1
W#3 DoublesTom Lee / James Hawxhurst vs Gerald Levesque / JOHN Pezza6-0, 6-1
2024-07-27vs RP:RP65:LevesqueWon 30
W#1 DoublesKevin Hotary / EARL Smith vs Ray Pezza / Robert Ringman6-4, 6-0
W#2 DoublesFred Lin / Rich Clippinger vs Gerald Levesque / JOHN Pezza6-0, 6-2
W#3 DoublesPeter Anastas / Tim Curtin vs Harvey Alberg / Joseph Pezza6-0, 6-0
2024-07-27vs RP:RP65:LevesqueWon 30
W#1 DoublesRich Clippinger / Fred Lin vs Ray Pezza / Robert Ringman6-1, 6-2
W#2 DoublesSteven Johnson / Tim Curtin vs Gerald Levesque / JOHN Pezza6-0, 6-0
W#3 DoublesPaul Raimondi / William Faye vs Richard Mable / Joseph Pezza6-2, 6-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings2 teams · 6.0 Men 1
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1NewEngland/Anastas/65&Over6.0M04120032
2RP:RP65:Levesque0401224146

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.82 estimated across 7 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

Fred Lin
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
3.02
Tim Curtin
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
2.99
Rich Clippinger
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
2.94
EARL Smith
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.86
James Hawxhurst
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 3
2.75
Peter Anastas
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
2.65
James Craffey
published 3
2.56
William Faye
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Kevin Hotary
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Paul Raimondi
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
Richard Neithamer
published
Rico Mastronunzio
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Steven Johnson
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

James Craffey + James Hawxhurst4356% games+7.4% vs expected
James Craffey + William Faye4351% gamesnot enough data
Paul Raimondi + James Craffey2346% gamesnot enough data
Paul Raimondi + William Faye3255% gamesnot enough data
Tim Curtin + James Hawxhurst4161% gamesnot enough data
Paul Raimondi + Rich Clippinger314 matchesnot enough data
Rich Clippinger + Peter Anastas044 matchesnot enough data
Rich Clippinger + James Craffey134 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Fred Lin
6W–3L career · 2 lines in 2024
not enough data
Tim Curtin
45W–24L career · 2 lines in 2024
<1%45%55%
3.02
Rich Clippinger
68W–74L career · 2 lines in 2024
<1%52%48%
2.99
3
EARL Smith
28W–26L career · 2 lines in 2024
<1%68%32%
2.94
3
James Hawxhurst
27W–20L career · 2 lines in 2024
<1%85%14%
2.86
Peter Anastas
56W–80L career · 2 lines in 2024
3%95%3%
2.75
3
James Craffey
66W–52L career · no lines in 2024
12%88%<1%
2.65
William Faye
27W–22L career · 2 lines in 2024
32%67%<1%
2.56
Kevin Hotary
31W–22L career · 2 lines in 2024
not enough data
Paul Raimondi
18W–23L career · 2 lines in 2024
not enough data
Richard Neithamer
12W–22L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
Rico Mastronunzio
35W–20L career · 2 lines in 2024
not enough data
Steven Johnson
19W–11L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.