Teams

The Determinators

2025 18&over Women Day Winter · 5.0

11 players · average NTRP 4.61 / NEW JERSEY REGION

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2025-03-27vs NJ: Chicks with SticksWon 21
W#1 DoublesCatherine Phillips / Amie Villarini vs Kimberly Rosenthal / Sarah Tirone3-6, 6-4, 1-0
L#1 SinglesKristen Bocina vs Amy Collins6-7, 5-4, 0-1
W#2 DoublesAdrienne Supino / Carol Hammond vs Amy Rizzuto / Jill Olman6-3, 6-3
2025-03-20vs NJ: Chicks with SticksLost 12
W#1 DoublesAmie Villarini / Catherine Phillips vs Amy Collins / Elena DeBarbadillo6-1, 6-1
L#1 SinglesKristen Bocina vs Sarah Tirone4-6, 5-6
L#2 DoublesAdrienne Supino / Daniela Kelley vs Jill Olman / Karen Wells6-3, 3-6, 0-1
2025-03-16vs NJ: Chicks with SticksLost 12
L#1 DoublesEllen Caruso-Garland / Carol Hammond vs Kimberly Rosenthal / Sarah Tirone2-6, 2-6
L#1 SinglesElise Gerdes vs Karin Weiner3-6, 2-5
W#2 DoublesCatherine Phillips / Angelina Frankovic vs Jill Olman / Karen Wells4-6, 6-3, 1-0
2025-03-09vs NJ: Chicks with SticksLost 03
L#1 DoublesAdrienne Supino / Catherine Phillips vs Danielle Hall / Karin Weiner4-6, 5-4, 0-1
L#1 SinglesElise Gerdes vs Amy Rizzuto6-7, 1-4
L#2 DoublesCarol Hammond / Deborah Berger vs Amy Collins / Elena DeBarbadillo4-6, 2-6
2025-03-06vs NJ: Chicks with SticksLost 12
W#1 DoublesAdrienne Supino / Catherine Phillips vs Elena DeBarbadillo / Amy Collins7-6, 2-4, 1-0
L#1 SinglesDaniela Kelley vs Amy Rizzuto3-6, 3-6
L#2 DoublesCarol Hammond / Amie Villarini vs Kimberly Rosenthal / Sarah Tirone3-6, 5-7
2025-03-02vs NJ: Chicks with SticksLost 03
L#1 DoublesEllen Caruso-Garland / Kei Imanishi vs Danielle Hall / Karin Weiner1-6, 2-6
L#1 SinglesElise Gerdes vs Amy Rizzuto2-6, 7-6, 0-1
L#2 DoublesDeborah Berger / Kristen Bocina vs Amy Collins / Elena DeBarbadillo1-6, 2-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings2 teams · 5.0
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1NJ: Chicks with Sticks5113514144
2The Determinators1551329190

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 4.34 estimated across 7 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

Amie Villarini
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 5
4.67
Adrienne Supino
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 5
4.52
Catherine Phillips
usually #1 Doubles 80%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published 5
4.40
Elise Gerdes
usually #1 Singles 100% · published 4.5
4.37
Kei Imanishi
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4.5
4.26
Kristen Bocina
usually #1 Singles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
Carol Hammond
published 4.5
Daniela Kelley
usually #1 Singles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 4.5
4.20
Angelina Frankovic
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 4.5
3.98
Deborah Berger
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 4
Ellen Caruso-Garland
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Carol Hammond + Ellen Caruso-Garland3453% games+0.6% vs expected
Adrienne Supino + Catherine Phillips4251% games−3.0% vs expected
Adrienne Supino + Daniela Kelley134 matchesnot enough data
Angelina Frankovic + Adrienne Supino303 matchesnot enough data
Angelina Frankovic + Catherine Phillips123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

5
Amie Villarini
8W–6L career · 3 lines in 2025
not enough data
5
Adrienne Supino
44W–13L career · 4 lines in 2025
no projection at this level
4.67
5
Catherine Phillips
39W–29L career · 5 lines in 2025
no projection at this level
4.52
4.5
Elise Gerdes
120W–89L career · 3 lines in 2025
<1%76%24%
4.40
4.5
Kei Imanishi
88W–76L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%81%18%
4.37
Kristen Bocina
57W–22L career · 3 lines in 2025
3%92%4%
4.26
4.5
Carol Hammond
13W–10L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
4.5
Daniela Kelley
6W–9L career · 2 lines in 2025
not enough data
4.5
Angelina Frankovic
33W–23L career · 1 line in 2025
8%91%2%
4.20
4
Deborah Berger
30W–34L career · type A · 2 lines in 2025
<1%55%45%
3.98
Ellen Caruso-Garland
3W–9L career · 2 lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.