Teams

WOOD:TheWoodlands:Lacombe

2021 ME Adult 18 & Over Women · 2.5 Women

8 players · average NTRP 3.50 / MAINE

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2021-05-15vs MRC:WreckingBalls:RoperSplit 11
W#1 DoublesMelissa And LaCasse / Diane Dow vs Jennifer Roper / Kimberly Nicolet6-2, 6-3
L#2 DoublesWhitney Wignall / Donyelle Werner vs Erica Gates / Elizabeth Moss3-6, 6-3, 0-1
2021-05-15Won 20
W#1 DoublesDiane Dow / Ann McCormick vs Sara Kovacs / Lori Lavoie6-1, 6-0
W#1 SinglesWhitney Wignall vs Alexandra Barr6-0, 6-2
2021-05-02vs MP:Lobstoppers:RobinsonWon 20
W#1 DoublesDana Musciano / Kelly Rodgers vs Mia Jones / Tess Chakkalakal5-7, 6-2, 1-0
W#1 SinglesWhitney Wignall vs Erin James6-0, 6-3
2021-05-02Won 30
W#1 DoublesLinda Rathbun / Deb Paszyc vs Lori Lavoie / Megan Smetana6-0, 6-0
W#1 SinglesKimberly Oconnell vs Kaitlin Minnehan6-2, 6-2
W#2 DoublesDana Musciano / Kelly Rodgers vs Rachel Goodell / Heather Shields6-1, 6-1
2021-04-11vs MP:Lobstoppers:RobinsonWon 20
W#1 DoublesKimberly Oconnell / Linda Rathbun vs Karin Tuuri / Elaine Bell6-2, 6-1
W#1 SinglesDeb Paszyc vs Tess Chakkalakal6-2, 6-1
2021-04-11vs MRC:WreckingBalls:RoperWon 20
W#1 DoublesDeb Paszyc / Linda Rathbun vs Erica Gates / Tina Lipmanowicz6-0, 6-0
W#1 SinglesKimberly Oconnell vs Jenn Messier6-3, 6-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 2.5 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.04 estimated across 4 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.39
Kimberly Oconnell
usually #2 Singles 38%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published
Deb Paszyc
usually #1 Doubles 63%, also #1 Singles 25% · published 3.5
Diane Dow
usually #2 Singles 40%, also #1 Singles 40% · published 3.5
3.02
Linda Rathbun
usually #1 Doubles 86%, also #2 Singles 14% · published
3.00
Whitney Wignall
usually #1 Singles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
2.74
Joanna Yu
published
Kelly Rodgers
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published
Tim Lacombe
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Linda Rathbun + Deb Paszyc224 matchesnot enough data
Kimberly Oconnell + Linda Rathbun303 matchesnot enough data
Kimberly Oconnell + Deb Paszyc303 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Kimberly Oconnell
68W–22L career · 8 lines in 2021
<1%81%19%
3.39
3.5
Deb Paszyc
36W–13L career · 8 lines in 2021
not enough data
3.5
Diane Dow
28W–11L career · 10 lines in 2021
not enough data
Linda Rathbun
14W–6L career · 7 lines in 2021
<1%45%55%
3.02
Whitney Wignall
52W–58L career · 3 lines in 2021
49%51%<1%
3.00
Joanna Yu
13W–21L career · no lines in 2021
3%94%2%
2.74
Kelly Rodgers
7W–16L career · 4 lines in 2021
not enough data
Tim Lacombe
2W–0L career · no lines in 2021
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.