Teams

Bartley/Memphis

2026 Adult 55 & Over-Memphis · 4.0 Men 55 & Over

11 players · average NTRP 4.00 / TENNESSEE

View scouting list →
Schedule3 played
2026-04-19vs Overstreet/MemphisWon 30
W#1 DoublesRichard Campbell / Gary Clancy vs Xuezhong Li / Bin Li6-3, 6-4
W#2 DoublesMichael Brennan / Neil Weston vs Dixon Stuart / Jeff Earnest6-4, 6-7, 1-0
W#3 DoublesMark Devine / Brett Hughes vs Donald Roshak / Leonard Moss6-3, 6-1
2026-03-22vs Overstreet/MemphisWon 21
L#1 DoublesNeil Weston / Brett Hughes vs Dixon Stuart / Jeff Earnest1-6, 5-7
W#2 DoublesMichael Brennan / Joe Johnson vs Brandon Wellford / Xuezhong Li0-6, 6-3, 1-0
W#3 DoublesGary Clancy / Kevin Dacus vs David Overstreet / William Stine4-6, 6-3, 1-0
2026-03-01vs Overstreet/MemphisWon 21
W#1 DoublesMichael Brennan / Joe Johnson vs Xuezhong Li / Bin Li6-4, 7-6
L#2 DoublesKevin Hayes / Kevin Dacus vs Brandon Wellford / Leonard Moss1-6, 1-6
W#3 DoublesRobert Carr / Gary Clancy vs David Overstreet / Dixon Stuart3-6, 6-3, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 4.0 Men 55 & Over have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.72 estimated across 8 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.97
Neil Weston
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
3.80
Paul Woods
published
3.78
Joe Johnson
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
3.76
Gary Clancy
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
3.66
Kevin Dacus
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
3.65
Terry Bartley
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
3.65
Brett Hughes
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 4
3.48
Kevin Hayes
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Jay Fletcher
published
Mark Devine
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Robert Carr
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Neil Weston
9W–4L career · 2 lines in 2026
<1%58%42%
3.97
Paul Woods
9W–2L career · no lines in 2026
2%91%8%
3.80
Joe Johnson
9W–5L career · 2 lines in 2026
2%92%6%
3.78
Gary Clancy
4W–6L career · 3 lines in 2026
3%93%4%
3.76
Kevin Dacus
7W–4L career · 2 lines in 2026
13%86%1%
3.66
Terry Bartley
9W–4L career · 2 lines in 2026
<1%14%86%
3.65
4
Brett Hughes
3W–3L career · 2 lines in 2026
15%84%1%
3.65
Kevin Hayes
3W–2L career · 1 line in 2026
57%43%<1%
3.48
Jay Fletcher
1W–1L career · no lines in 2026
not enough data
Mark Devine
1W–0L career · 1 line in 2026
not enough data
Robert Carr
1W–0L career · 1 line in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.