Teams

Lagoon Holmes

2025 40 & Over Southern Combo Doubles - Night-Montgomery · 6.5 Combo Women

14 players · average NTRP 3.50 / ALABAMA

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2025-08-25vs MG GarrettLost 12
L#1 DoublesJennifer Luster / Regina Dinger vs Rachel Todd / Molly Killingsworth2-6, 3-6
W#2 DoublesJanice Scott / DEBRA SLEDGE vs Shirley Garrett / Angela Hampton6-1, 6-1
L#3 DoublesJanet Carroll / Mary Weidler vs Tracy Bird / Jennifer Roberts1-6, 0-6
2025-08-11vs MG GarrettLost 12
W#1 DoublesDEBRA SLEDGE / Janice Scott vs Julie Norris / Jennifer Dobbs3-6, 4-2
L#2 DoublesTina Ward / Diane Johnson vs Holly Sharp / Molly Killingsworth2-6, 1-6
L#3 DoublesJoan Ensley / Regina Dinger vs Rose Pendleton / Sharon Woernle3-6, 1-6
2025-08-04vs MG GarrettLost 03
L#1 DoublesJanet Carroll / DEBRA SLEDGE vs Emily Elliott / Miriam Scharf0-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesTina Ward / Diane Johnson vs Shirley Garrett / Holly Sharp4-6, 2-6
L#3 DoublesRebecca Myrick / Jewell Pitts vs Kelly DeLaitsch / Sharon Woernle6-3, 2-6, 1-0
2025-07-21vs MG GarrettLost 02
L#1 DoublesJanet Carroll / Debra Henning vs Rose Pendleton / Molly Killingsworth0-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesTina Ward / Diane Johnson vs Jennifer Dobbs / Jennifer Roberts2-6, 0-6
2025-07-14vs MG GarrettLost 12
W#1 DoublesJanice Scott / DEBRA SLEDGE vs Emily Elliott / Jennifer Dobbs6-4, 6-4
L#2 DoublesJennifer Luster / Debra Henning vs Julie Norris / Sharon Woernle3-6, 2-6
L#3 DoublesSarah Sutton / Joan Ensley vs Angela Hampton / Jennifer Roberts0-6, 2-6
2025-07-07vs MG GarrettSplit 11
L#1 DoublesTina Ward / Mary Weidler vs Julie Norris / Holly Sharp2-6, 3-6
W#3 DoublesRebecca Myrick / Jewell Pitts vs Shirley Garrett / Miriam Scharf6-4, 7-5
2025-06-30vs MG GarrettLost 12
W#1 DoublesJanice Scott / DEBRA SLEDGE vs Julie Norris / Jennifer Roberts7-5, 7-6
L#2 DoublesJanet Carroll / Joan Ensley vs Shirley Garrett / Holly Sharp1-6, 1-6
L#3 DoublesTina Ward / Regina Dinger vs Molly Killingsworth / Miriam Scharf4-6, 0-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 6.5 Combo Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.04 estimated across 12 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.82
Antonio Holmes
published 4
3.47
Janice Scott
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published
3.26
Rebecca Myrick
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
3.14
Jennifer Luster
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
3.10
DEBRA SLEDGE
usually #1 Doubles 80%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published 3
3.06
Janet Carroll
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published
2.98
Tina Ward
usually #2 Doubles 60%, also #1 Doubles 20% · published
2.80
Regina Dinger
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
2.77
Joan Ensley
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
2.75
Mary Weidler
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
2.66
Julie Knight
published
2.64
Jewell Pitts
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Debra Henning
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
Sarah Sutton
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Janice Scott + DEBRA SLEDGE7255% games+5.6% vs expected
Joan Ensley + Regina Dinger141846% games−0.6% vs expected
Regina Dinger + DEBRA SLEDGE4450% games−3.9% vs expected
Janet Carroll + Rebecca Myrick5850% games−7.7% vs expected
Regina Dinger + Jewell Pitts134 matchesnot enough data
Joan Ensley + Mary Weidler303 matchesnot enough data
Joan Ensley + Jewell Pitts033 matchesnot enough data
Joan Ensley + Tina Ward213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Antonio Holmes
13W–10L career · no lines in 2025
1%91%9%
3.82
Janice Scott
50W–41L career · 4 lines in 2025
60%40%<1%
3.47
Rebecca Myrick
14W–17L career · 2 lines in 2025
2%94%3%
3.26
Jennifer Luster
13W–15L career · 2 lines in 2025
13%86%<1%
3.14
3
DEBRA SLEDGE
46W–31L career · 5 lines in 2025
<1%22%78%
3.10
Janet Carroll
26W–44L career · 4 lines in 2025
31%69%<1%
3.06
Tina Ward
40W–47L career · 5 lines in 2025
55%45%<1%
2.98
Regina Dinger
52W–69L career · 3 lines in 2025
1%93%6%
2.80
Joan Ensley
44W–75L career · 3 lines in 2025
2%94%4%
2.77
Mary Weidler
19W–20L career · 2 lines in 2025
2%95%3%
2.75
Julie Knight
35W–44L career · no lines in 2025
11%88%<1%
2.66
Jewell Pitts
9W–41L career · 2 lines in 2025
14%86%<1%
2.64
Debra Henning
1W–3L career · 2 lines in 2025
not enough data
Sarah Sutton
11W–3L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.