Teams

LWR Liquid Ranchers

2025 Sarasota Combo 18 & Over Summer Weekday · 8.5 W Thursday

13 players · average NTRP 4.20 / REGION_5

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2025-08-28vs Sarasota/Wilson/18&Over8.5WLost 02
L#2 DoublesNia Esposito / Diana Stadelnikas vs Mary Wilson / Yudi Carpenter2-6, 0-6
L#3 DoublesMegan McAloon / Christie Uihlein vs Sally Alford / Kara Beene2-6, 4-6
2025-08-14vs SSC RosesWon 10
W#1 DoublesNia Esposito / Kim Eck vs Tambra Ford / Lisa Brandy6-3, 2-6, 1-0
2025-08-07vs LBK Public Island GirlsWon 20
W#2 DoublesNia Esposito / Diana Stadelnikas vs Wendy Hillock / Natalie Bloch7-5, 3-6, 1-0
W#3 DoublesMegan McAloon / Kim Eck vs Dorene Seider / Mari-Ann Kucharek6-1, 6-3
2025-07-31vs Plantation Rock LobstersLost 01
L#2 DoublesCarol Frazier / Kim Eck vs Maureen Thomas / Lisa Rott4-6, 4-6
2025-07-24vs Sarasota/Wilson/18&Over8.5WLost 01
L#1 DoublesKim Eck / Diana Stadelnikas vs Yudi Carpenter / Jennifer Bright4-6, 4-6
2025-07-17vs Plantation Rock LobstersWon 10
W#2 DoublesMegan McAloon / Allyson Hoffman vs Diane Crews / Janet Kramer6-2, 6-4
2025-07-10vs SSC RosesLost 01
L#2 DoublesKim Eck / Nia Esposito vs Emily Weitekamp / Jennifer Butcher5-7, 0-6
2025-06-26vs LBK Public Island GirlsSplit 11
L#1 DoublesChristie Boylston / Megan McAloon vs Dorene Seider / Mari-Ann Kucharek7-5, 5-7, 0-1
W#3 DoublesDiana Stadelnikas / Kim Eck vs Lisa Tyson / Pat Brugger0-6, 6-4, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 8.5 W Thursday have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.96 estimated across 12 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.51
Carol Frazier
published 4.5
4.30
Christie Boylston
published 4.5
4.29
Allyson Hoffman
published 4.5
4.03
Kim Eck
usually #3 Doubles 33%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.99
Megan McAloon
usually #1 Doubles 38%, also #2 Doubles 38% · published 4
3.91
Nia Esposito
usually #3 Doubles 43%, also #2 Doubles 43% · published 4
3.80
Elizabeth Goelz
published 4
3.79
Elizabeth Green
published 4.5
3.79
Lauren Larkin
published
Christie Uihlein
published 4
3.71
Karen Nicholson
published
3.71
Diana Stadelnikas
usually #2 Doubles 57%, also #1 Doubles 29% · published 4
3.69
Karen Spiegel
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Nia Esposito + Megan McAloon5257% games+5.7% vs expected
Elizabeth Green + Allyson Hoffman2354% games+3.2% vs expected
Diana Stadelnikas + Nia Esposito18955% games+2.6% vs expected
Diana Stadelnikas + Kim Eck3352% gamesnot enough data
Diana Stadelnikas + Megan McAloon314 matchesnot enough data
Karen Nicholson + Carol Frazier404 matchesnot enough data
Nia Esposito + Karen Spiegel314 matchesnot enough data
Lauren Larkin + Megan McAloon404 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4.5
Carol Frazier
18W–1L career · type D · no lines in 2025
<1%47%53%
4.51
4.5
Christie Boylston
6W–2L career · no lines in 2025
1%93%6%
4.30
4.5
Allyson Hoffman
4W–4L career · no lines in 2025
1%93%6%
4.29
4
Kim Eck
56W–31L career · 6 lines in 2025
<1%42%58%
4.03
4
Megan McAloon
137W–47L career · 8 lines in 2025
<1%52%48%
3.99
4
Nia Esposito
154W–82L career · 7 lines in 2025
<1%76%24%
3.91
4
Elizabeth Goelz
5W–4L career · no lines in 2025
1%92%7%
3.80
4.5
Elizabeth Green
5W–9L career · no lines in 2025
95%5%<1%
3.79
Lauren Larkin
6W–4L career · no lines in 2025
1%94%5%
3.79
4
Christie Uihlein
1W–1L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Karen Nicholson
11W–8L career · no lines in 2025
5%93%1%
3.71
4
Diana Stadelnikas
106W–106L career · 7 lines in 2025
6%93%1%
3.71
Karen Spiegel
10W–8L career · no lines in 2025
7%92%1%
3.69

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.