Teams

YORK:Lobsterettes:Phillips:Green

2023 NH Adult 18 & Over Women Evening · 3.5 Women

21 players · average NTRP 3.50 / NEW HAMPSHIRE

View scouting list →
Schedule9 played
2023-06-29vs YMCA:Radke:NobertSplit 22
L#1 DoublesNancy Leigh / Dede Cadieux vs Andrea Sullivan / Denise Nobert0-6, 2-6
W#1 SinglesElyssa DelValle vs Amanda Lade-Sullivan7-5, 5-3
W#2 DoublesBarbara Green / Cinde Vandette vs Julie Chrissis / Ying Zhan6-0, 5-3
L#3 DoublesRegina Lammers / Sarah Naphen vs Lori Wiechers / Carrie Fontaine0-6, 0-4
2023-06-22vs BED:BedfordBees:Gardner:HowellLost 12
L#1 DoublesDede Cadieux / Susan MacRi vs Jana Suozzo / Meghan Howell1-6, 6-3, 0-1
W#2 DoublesRegina Lammers / Jessie Phillips vs JOLENE JOHNSON / Erin Manning6-4, 2-6, 1-0
L#3 DoublesSuzanne McGrain / Sarah Naphen vs Lisa Giroux / Cheryl Conaway-Nelson6-4, 0-6, 0-1
2023-06-15vs GB:King:FrenchSplit 22
L#1 DoublesNancy Leigh / Jessie Phillips vs Laura Stone / Molly French4-6, 1-6
W#1 SinglesElyssa DelValle vs Alison Brzenchek2-6, 6-4, 1-0
W#2 DoublesElaine Epstein / Dede Cadieux vs Laurel Erickson / Sayre Malone2-6, 6-4, 1-0
L#3 DoublesFern Phillips / Regina Lammers vs Christina King / Sophie Leigh0-6, 1-6
2023-06-08vs YMCA:Radke:NobertSplit 22
L#1 DoublesDede Cadieux / Nancy Leigh vs Jennifer Henry / Nicole Driscoll6-2, 5-7, 0-1
W#1 SinglesJessie Phillips vs Amanda Lade-Sullivan6-2, 6-4
W#2 DoublesCinde Vandette / Barbara Green vs Denise Nobert / Andrea Sullivan7-5, 2-5, 1-0
L#3 DoublesElaine Epstein / Sarah Naphen vs Jennifer Mosle / Julie Chrissis2-6, 2-6
2023-06-01vs BED:BedfordBees:Gardner:HowellWon 21
W#1 DoublesDede Cadieux / Sheilah McGovern vs Susan Rouleau / Meghan Howell6-3, 6-1
L#2 DoublesSouci Rollins / Cinde Vandette vs JOLENE JOHNSON / Cheryl Conaway-Nelson6-4, 2-6, 0-1
W#3 DoublesElyssa DelValle / Margaret Galligan vs Jennifer Theodore / Erin Manning4-6, 6-3, 1-0
2023-05-25vs GB:King:FrenchWon 31
W#1 DoublesNancy Leigh / Barbara Green vs Sophie Leigh / Laura Stone4-6, 1-0, 1-0
L#1 SinglesElyssa DelValle vs Alison Brzenchek4-6, 1-3
W#2 DoublesHeather Campbell / Dede Cadieux vs Christina King / Sayre Malone7-6, 2-4, 1-0
W#3 DoublesElaine Epstein / Sheilah McGovern vs Jen Lader / Michelle Pageau7-6, 4-2
2023-05-18vs YMCA:Radke:NobertLost 13
L#1 DoublesDede Cadieux / Sheilah McGovern vs Jennifer Henry / Nicole Ledoux3-6, 6-7
L#1 SinglesJessie Phillips vs Nicole Driscoll2-6, 3-6
L#2 DoublesHeather Campbell / Gabriella Hughes vs Andrea Sullivan / Susan Bossi5-7, 5-3, 0-1
W#3 DoublesBarbara Green / Kristan Pavona vs Julie Chrissis / Lisa Walker2-6, 6-3, 1-0
2023-05-12vs BED:BedfordBees:Gardner:HowellLost 12
L#1 DoublesJessie Phillips / Margaret Galligan vs Jana Suozzo / Sandra Jean2-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesRegina Lammers / Sarah Naphen vs Noel Correnti / Susan Rouleau0-6, 5-6
W#3 DoublesCinde Vandette / Barbara Green vs Cheryl Conaway-Nelson / Lisa Giroux6-2, 6-1
2023-05-04vs GB:King:FrenchLost 13
W#1 DoublesJessie Phillips / Nancy Leigh vs Michelle Pageau / Christina King4-6, 6-1, 1-0
L#1 SinglesElyssa DelValle vs Laura Stone3-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesRegina Lammers / Cinde Vandette vs Molly French / Andrea Grenier1-6, 3-6
L#3 DoublesFern Phillips / Sarah Naphen vs Laurel Erickson / Mary Lafreniere2-6, 0-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 3.5 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.08 estimated across 11 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.43
Jesse Kohler
published
3.29
Maryse Newton
published
3.27
Margaret Galligan
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
3.25
Sheilah McGovern
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
Cinde Vandette
usually #2 Doubles 80%, also #3 Doubles 20% · published 3.5
Dede Cadieux
usually #1 Doubles 71%, also #2 Doubles 29% · published 3.5
3.20
Kristan Pavona
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
3.18
Gabriella Hughes
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.13
Barbara Green
usually #3 Doubles 40%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published 3.5
3.08
Mary Quinn
published
2.77
Fern Phillips
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
2.64
Elaine Epstein
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
2.62
Elyssa DelValle
usually #1 Singles 80%, also #3 Doubles 20% · published
Heather Campbell
published
Jessie Phillips
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #1 Singles 33% · published
Nancy Leigh
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Regina Lammers
usually #2 Doubles 60%, also #3 Doubles 40% · published
Sarah Naphen
usually #3 Doubles 80%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published
Souci Rollins
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Susan MacRi
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Suzanne McGrain
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Cinde Vandette + Barbara Green11654% games+5.8% vs expected
Sheilah McGovern + Margaret Galligan3455% games+1.7% vs expected
Margaret Galligan + Barbara Green4252% games−1.9% vs expected
Cinde Vandette + Souci Rollins1442% games−12.0% vs expected
Souci Rollins + Barbara Green5257% gamesnot enough data
Elyssa DelValle + Elaine Epstein2343% gamesnot enough data
Jessie Phillips + Elaine Epstein134 matchesnot enough data
Kristan Pavona + Jesse Kohler314 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Jesse Kohler
44W–12L career · no lines in 2023
<1%68%32%
3.43
Maryse Newton
11W–16L career · no lines in 2023
2%91%7%
3.29
Margaret Galligan
24W–33L career · 2 lines in 2023
3%92%5%
3.27
Sheilah McGovern
33W–26L career · 3 lines in 2023
4%93%4%
3.25
3.5
Cinde Vandette
18W–20L career · type S · 5 lines in 2023
not enough data
3.5
Dede Cadieux
8W–10L career · 7 lines in 2023
not enough data
Kristan Pavona
54W–31L career · 1 line in 2023
8%91%2%
3.20
Gabriella Hughes
11W–9L career · 1 line in 2023
10%89%1%
3.18
3.5
Barbara Green
69W–72L career · 5 lines in 2023
18%81%<1%
3.13
Mary Quinn
43W–56L career · no lines in 2023
29%71%<1%
3.08
Fern Phillips
33W–43L career · 2 lines in 2023
3%92%5%
2.77
Elaine Epstein
18W–35L career · 3 lines in 2023
16%84%1%
2.64
Elyssa DelValle
32W–57L career · 5 lines in 2023
19%81%<1%
2.62
Heather Campbell
24W–10L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Jessie Phillips
14W–18L career · 6 lines in 2023
not enough data
Nancy Leigh
13W–24L career · 5 lines in 2023
not enough data
Regina Lammers
17W–30L career · 5 lines in 2023
not enough data
Sarah Naphen
2W–11L career · 5 lines in 2023
not enough data
Souci Rollins
15W–14L career · 1 line in 2023
not enough data
Susan MacRi
0W–1L career · 1 line in 2023
not enough data
Suzanne McGrain
0W–1L career · 1 line in 2023
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.