Teams

MCL WALKER

2024 FW USTA · USPTA Adult Fall Ladies N

7 players · average NTRP 2.62 / TEXAS

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →

Flight standings for USPTA Adult Fall Ladies N have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.18 estimated across 6 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

2.73
Eileen Pekarev
published 3
2.56
Mary D'Alise
published
Emma Ghorbani
published 2.5
2.20
Cayla Grossman
published 2.5
2.07
Kenzie Cimpl
published
1.78
Hilde Viroux
published 2.5
1.77
Jillian Cordova
published
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3
Eileen Pekarev
9W–9L career · no lines in 2024
4%94%2%
2.73
Mary D'Alise
4W–7L career · no lines in 2024
34%66%<1%
2.56
2.5
Emma Ghorbani
0W–4L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
2.5
Cayla Grossman
10W–16L career · no lines in 2024
0%99%1%
2.20
Kenzie Cimpl
3W–5L career · no lines in 2024
>99%<1%<1%
2.07
2.5
Hilde Viroux
1W–24L career · no lines in 2024
0%>99%<1%
1.78
Jillian Cordova
1W–11L career · no lines in 2024
0%>99%<1%
1.77

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.