Teams

Fort King Raiders

2022 Marion Combo 18 & Over · 6.5 Men

9 players · average NTRP 3.50 / REGION_2

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2022-12-07vs MARION/Centonze/Men/6.5Split 11
W#1 DoublesGary Greer / Glen Gandiongco vs Patrick Acevedo / Kevin Laird6-3, 6-2
L#2 DoublesDwayne Molock / John Mcmichael vs Marius Taricic / Michael Basbano1-6, 6-2, 1-0
2022-12-06vs MARION/Centonze/Men/6.5Won 10
W#3 DoublesGary Greer / Glen Gandiongco vs George Ryals / Tyler Jones6-4, 6-1
2022-11-21vs MARION/Centonze/Men/6.5Lost 02
L#1 DoublesWilliam Thomas / John Mcmichael vs Danny York / Kevin Laird3-6, 4-6
L#2 DoublesDillon Lagano / Dwayne Molock vs Marius Taricic / Weston Wise2-6, 3-6
2022-11-18vs MARION/Centonze/Men/6.5Won 10
W#1 DoublesJohn Mcmichael / William Thomas vs Ryan Paul / George Ryals4-6, 6-4, 1-0
2022-10-30vs MARION/Centonze/Men/6.5Lost 02
L#1 DoublesPeter Grosshans / John Hall vs Marius Taricic / Danny York2-6, 3-6
L#2 DoublesGlen Gandiongco / Tim Kennedy vs Ryan Paul / Kevin Laird6-4, 2-6, 0-1
2022-10-28vs MARION/Centonze/Men/6.5Won 10
W#1 DoublesDwayne Molock / Peter Grosshans vs George Ryals / Joel Yap6-3, 6-4
2022-10-16vs MARION/Centonze/Men/6.5Lost 01
L#1 DoublesDwayne Molock / Peter Grosshans vs Danny York / Kevin Laird6-2, 2-6, 0-1
2022-10-09vs MARION/Centonze/Men/6.5Won 10
W#1 DoublesDwayne Molock / Peter Grosshans vs Kevin Laird / Ryan Paul6-2, 2-6, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 6.5 Men have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.32 estimated across 6 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.64
Peter Grosshans
usually #1 Doubles 83%, also #3 Doubles 17% · published 4
3.50
3.44
Dillon Lagano
published 3.5
3.37
Gary Greer
published 3.5
Jack Matlock
published 3.5
3.16
Glen Gandiongco
usually #2 Doubles 40%, also #3 Doubles 40% · published 3.5
2.80
Dwayne Molock
usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published 3
John Mcmichael
usually #1 Doubles 80%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published
Rick Durham
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Glen Gandiongco + Dwayne Molock4251% gamesnot enough data
Glen Gandiongco + Peter Grosshans123 matchesnot enough data
Dwayne Molock + Peter Grosshans213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Peter Grosshans
148W–115L career · 6 lines in 2022
14%86%<1%
3.64
3.5
Christopher Clements
21W–15L career · no lines in 2022
<1%52%48%
3.50
3.5
Dillon Lagano
6W–4L career · no lines in 2022
<1%68%32%
3.44
3.5
Gary Greer
12W–11L career · no lines in 2022
<1%84%16%
3.37
3.5
Jack Matlock
0W–1L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
3.5
Glen Gandiongco
123W–124L career · 5 lines in 2022
11%89%<1%
3.16
3
Dwayne Molock
74W–71L career · 5 lines in 2022
1%93%6%
2.80
John Mcmichael
75W–35L career · 5 lines in 2022
not enough data
Rick Durham
2W–6L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.