← Teams

SHC-Monson

2020 Adult 18 & Over · 4.0 Men

8 players · average NTRP 4.06 · USTA/PACIFIC NW / NORTHERN OREGON

View scouting list →
Scouting

Roster averages 3.80 estimated across 6 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.18
Honorato Wenceslao
usually #2 Doubles 33%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 4.5
4.13
Jon Monson
usually #2 Doubles 43%, also #1 Doubles 29% · published 4.5
3.94
Marcus Kroloff
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 4
—
Brian Theobald
usually #2 Singles 80%, also #1 Singles 20% · published 4
—
Jason Crawford
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.70
Sam Bradshaw
usually #2 Singles 100% · published 4
3.46
Bill Rhoades
usually #3 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 4
3.38
Russ DeMoss
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
Results8 ties
2020-02-23Won 3–1
W#1 DoublesMarcus Kroloff / Honorato Wenceslao vs Jason Cyr / Deepak Selvanathan6-3, 7-6
W#2 DoublesJon Monson / Jaap Sparrius vs Vimal Natarajan / Brad Wade6-4, 6-2
L#2 SinglesBrian Theobald vs Dao Her6-2, 6-1
W#3 DoublesBill Rhoades / Paul Garry vs Szuchi Wu / Ryan Patterson6-1, 1-6, 1-0
2020-02-15Won 4–1
L#1 DoublesJaap Sparrius / Jason Crawford vs Donald Brenneman / Jonathan Barg3-6, 6-4, 1-0
W#1 SinglesBrian Theobald vs Devin Tau2-6, 6-2, 1-0
W#2 DoublesHonorato Wenceslao / Jae Joon Kang vs Brian Brown / Thomas Carter6-3, 6-0
W#2 SinglesJon Monson vs Radu Teodorescu6-3, 6-3
W#3 DoublesMarcus Kroloff / Paul Garry vs Paul Kerkar / Tim Leatherman6-4, 7-5
2020-02-01Won 3–1
W#1 DoublesJaap Sparrius / Marcus Kroloff vs Quyen Wong / Steve Swan6-3, 3-6, 1-0
W#2 DoublesJon Monson / Jason Crawford vs Lee Wiegand / Tony Tully6-3, 6-3
L#2 SinglesBrian Theobald vs Arun Vijayakumar6-2, 1-6, 1-0
W#3 DoublesBill Rhoades / Russ DeMoss vs Jeff Hanson / Ron Hawk6-1, 6-1
2020-01-11Won 4–0
W#1 DoublesJon Monson / Jaap Sparrius vs Jack Carlson / Philip Stephenson6-4, 6-4
W#2 DoublesBill Rhoades / Russ DeMoss vs Martin Schnappenberger / Ed Stoner6-4, 3-6, 1-0
W#2 SinglesBrian Theobald vs Gregory Gonzalez6-7, 7-6, 1-0
W#3 DoublesHonorato Wenceslao / Jae Joon Kang vs Richard Jennings / Tochukwu George6-2, 6-0
2020-01-04Won 3–1
L#1 DoublesJaap Sparrius / Jason Crawford vs Jason Cyr / Deepak Selvanathan6-1, 5-7, 1-0
W#1 SinglesJon Monson vs Rahul Bilakanti6-1, 6-3
W#2 DoublesRuss DeMoss / Honorato Wenceslao vs Brad Wade / Mitchell Whitehurst6-3, 3-6, 1-0
W#2 SinglesSam Bradshaw vs Santhanakrishnan Balakrishnan6-3, 6-2
2019-12-15Won 1–0
W#1 DoublesJon Monson / Michele O'Brien vs D'Arcy Martin / Marje Ferek6-3, 7-6
2019-12-14Lost 0–1
L#2 DoublesJon Monson / Cynthia Perelli-Minetti vs Sankavi Subbiah / Trung Huynh6-3, 6-0
2019-12-07Split 1–1
W#1 DoublesRuss DeMoss / John McCroskey vs Carlin Jackson / Tony Moreno6-3, 3-6, 1-0
L#3 DoublesBill Rhoades / Mark Stephenson vs Ken Crowley / Steve Carns7-5, 3-6, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits.

4.5
Honorato Wenceslao
128W–74L career
1%99%0%
4.18
4.5
Jon Monson
112W–41L career
2%98%0%
4.13
4
Marcus Kroloff
33W–11L career
0%86%14%
3.94
4
Brian Theobald
13W–15L career
not enough data
—
4
Jason Crawford
33W–25L career
not enough data
—
4
Sam Bradshaw
30W–19L career
4%96%0%
3.70
4
Bill Rhoades
79W–87L career
43%57%0%
3.46
3.5
Russ DeMoss
84W–42L career · type A
0%97%3%
3.38

Three percentages are the year-end projection — chance of moving down, staying, moving up — and the number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.