Teams

The Clean Winnerz

2026 Adult 18 & Over-Knoxville · 4.5 Men

7 players · average NTRP 4.50 / TENNESSEE

View scouting list →
Schedule5 played
2026-05-17vs Ambrose/KnoxvilleSplit 11
W#1 DoublesAnthony Arnieri / John MacOn vs Kevin Hetzer / Spencer Christen6-2, 6-4
L#1 SinglesEli MacOn vs Blaine Barber6-2, 1-6, 0-1
2026-05-03vs JuMpArOuNdWon 10
W#1 DoublesEli MacOn / John MacOn vs Hayden Oakley / Lance Saunders0-6, 6-3, 1-0
2026-04-19vs Ambrose/KnoxvilleLost 02
L#1 DoublesCharlie Craft / Ethan Eisenhauer vs Dawson Randolph / Kevin Hetzer3-6, 2-6
L#1 SinglesJohn Foust vs Blaine Barber3-6, 3-0
2026-04-12vs JuMpArOuNdWon 20
W#1 DoublesJohn Foust / Andrew Kuhlo vs Greg Kirby / Hayden Oakley6-3, 4-6, 1-0
W#2 DoublesCharlie Craft / Ethan Eisenhauer vs Sean Wilson / Kyle Franklin6-4, 6-2
2026-03-15vs JuMpArOuNdWon 21
W#1 DoublesEthan Eisenhauer / Eli MacOn vs Greg Kirby / Zachary Jumper7-6, 6-4
W#1 SinglesGonzalo de Villa vs Jordan Rockwell6-1, 6-0
L#2 DoublesAustin Dang / John Foust vs Mike McCarty / Sean Wilson4-6, 6-7
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings2 teams · 4.5 Men
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1The Clean Winnerz4212614117
2JuMpArOuNd1551329201

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 4.03 estimated across 3 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

Andrew Kuhlo
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4.5
4.05
Eli MacOn
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #1 Singles 33% · published
4.03
Ethan Eisenhauer
usually #1 Singles 43%, also #1 Doubles 29% · published
4.02
John Foust
usually #1 Singles 33%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
Gonzalo de Villa
usually #1 Singles 100% · published
Grant Parker
published
John MacOn
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4.5
Andrew Kuhlo
1W–0L career · 1 line in 2026
not enough data
Eli MacOn
11W–5L career · 3 lines in 2026
36%64%<1%
4.05
Ethan Eisenhauer
9W–1L career · 7 lines in 2026
<1%42%58%
4.03
John Foust
4W–3L career · 3 lines in 2026
45%55%<1%
4.02
Gonzalo de Villa
4W–1L career · 1 line in 2026
not enough data
Grant Parker
1W–2L career · no lines in 2026
not enough data
John MacOn
5W–1L career · 2 lines in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.