Teams

Stroede John

2025 Adult 18 & Over Winter 2.5W - 5.0 & Open · 4.0 Men

12 players · average NTRP 3.88 / HEART OF AMERICA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule1 played
2024-10-12vs Hanover, ScottLost 12
W#1 DoublesDerrick Field / Gonzalo Francisco Rodriguez vs Scott Williamson / Aaron Greenbaum6-2, 6-2
L#2 DoublesThomas Ohnemus / Ravi Peru vs R Scott Hanover / Daniel Miskowic4-6, 3-6
L#3 DoublesKevin Jackson / John Stroede vs Vick Singh / Tristan Houchin4-6, 1-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 4.0 Men have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.69 estimated across 11 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.86
Ravi Peru
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.78
Derrick Field
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.75
Jan Claussen
published
3.75
Mitchell Bennett
published
3.74
Brian Burton
published 4
3.72
Gonzalo Francisco Rodriguez
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.71
Thomas Ohnemus
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.69
Brendan Gore
published 4
3.65
Shawn Beelman
published
3.52
Jeff Ganaden
published
3.45
John Stroede
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Cameron Corbet
published 3.5
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Mitchell Bennett + Brendan Gore11355% games+5.6% vs expected
Ravi Peru + Shawn Beelman4357% games+2.1% vs expected
Mitchell Bennett + Derrick Field6057% games+0.2% vs expected
Thomas Ohnemus + Gonzalo Francisco Rodriguez6154% games+0.2% vs expected
Jeff Ganaden + Jan Claussen10952% games−1.4% vs expected
Mitchell Bennett + John Stroede2350% games−1.7% vs expected
Derrick Field + Brian Burton11556% games−3.5% vs expected
Mitchell Bennett + Jeff Ganaden7849% games−8.4% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Ravi Peru
55W–31L career · 1 line in 2025
1%84%15%
3.86
4
Derrick Field
49W–18L career · 1 line in 2025
2%92%6%
3.78
Jan Claussen
77W–59L career · no lines in 2025
4%93%4%
3.75
Mitchell Bennett
132W–61L career · no lines in 2025
4%93%4%
3.75
4
Brian Burton
70W–39L career · no lines in 2025
4%92%3%
3.74
Gonzalo Francisco Rodriguez
33W–15L career · 1 line in 2025
6%92%2%
3.72
Thomas Ohnemus
71W–37L career · 1 line in 2025
6%92%2%
3.71
4
Brendan Gore
67W–18L career · no lines in 2025
9%90%1%
3.69
Shawn Beelman
43W–37L career · no lines in 2025
14%85%1%
3.65
Jeff Ganaden
99W–82L career · no lines in 2025
<1%44%56%
3.52
John Stroede
45W–44L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%64%36%
3.45
3.5
Cameron Corbet
1W–3L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.