Teams

Clancy 55s 6.5W Combo W Fri AM

2026 Piedmont Combo 55 & Over · 6.5 Women 55 & Over

15 players · average NTRP 3.25 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule5 played
2026-08-28vs Collins 55s 6.5 Combo W Fri AMWon 30
W#1 DoublesTeresa Cruz / DEBORAH WELLS vs Lynette Paley / Page Kreager6-3, 6-7, 1-0
W#2 DoublesMary Batts / Melanie Burns vs Suzanne Perez / Lauren Collins6-0, 6-1
W#3 DoublesTeri Bramsway / Shannon Hughes vs Suzanne Andia / Beth Carter7-5, 6-0
W#1 DoublesTeresa Cruz / Vania Robinson vs Jan Whittaker / Anne Benda6-4, 2-6, 1-0
W#2 DoublesJill Fritz / DEBORAH WELLS vs Jacqueline Herron / Katie Bir6-2, 6-4
L#3 DoublesDebbie Clancy / Laura Ambler vs Melissa Goodman / Dana Marpoe4-6, 3-6
2026-08-14vs MacFadden 55s 6.5W Combo Fri AMWon 30
W#1 DoublesDebbie Clancy / Laura Ambler vs Julie Brennan / Jaime Hendricks6-2, 1-6, 1-0
W#2 DoublesMary Batts / DEBORAH WELLS vs Vickie Degges / Pamela Finn6-3, 6-2
W#3 DoublesChristina Schulenklopper / Donna Davis vs Gina Kinard / Sherri Nichols Hill6-3, 5-2
W#1 DoublesTeresa Cruz / Shannon Hughes vs Patricia Barman / Patty Dutton6-2, 6-7, 1-0
L#2 DoublesTeri Bramsway / Lora Snyder vs Elizabeth Tiedemann / Michelle Harris2-6, 2-6
W#3 DoublesMary Batts / Melanie Burns vs Betsey Wells / Noreena Cole6-1, 6-3
2026-07-31vs Wolff 55s 6.5W Combo Fri AMWon 30
W#1 DoublesTeresa Cruz / Vania Robinson vs Lucy Callahan / Kristin Gile6-2, 6-0
W#2 DoublesDebbie Clancy / Laura Ambler vs Tara Frame / Christine Kendall6-3, 6-1
W#3 DoublesBrenda Varner / Jill Fritz vs Teri MacDonald Cadieux / Gerry Johnson6-0, 6-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings13 teams · 6.5 Women 55 & Over
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1Clancy 55s 6.5W Combo W Fri AM3081450
2Kirby 55s 6.5W Combo Tues PM2051344
3Collins 55s 6.5 Combo W Fri AM2154870
4Berreth/Herron 55s 6.5W Combo Fri AM2163966
5Pressley 55s 6.5W Combo Tues Pm1030224
6White/Redding 55s 6.5W Combo Tues PM1142648
7Chapman/Partagas 55s 6.5W Combo Fri AM12451081
8MacFadden 55s 6.5W Combo Fri AM12451288
9Billings/Wilson 55s 6.5W Combo Tues PM000000
10Shivaji 55s 6.5W Combo Tues PM0103631
11Rhyne/Gorham 55s 6.5W Combo Tues PM0103635
12Ysidron 55s 6.5W Combo Tues PM0103636
13Wolff 55s 6.5W Combo Fri AM030918106

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.15 estimated across 15 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.56
Teresa Cruz
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.54
Mary Batts
usually #1 Doubles 40%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published
3.53
Kimberly Franz
published
3.50
Jill Fritz
usually #2 Doubles 75%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published
3.42
Debbie Clancy
usually #2 Doubles 40%, also #3 Doubles 40% · published 3.5
3.38
Christina Schulenklopper
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.18
Teri Bramsway
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
3.05
DEBORAH WELLS
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 3
3.00
Vania Robinson
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
2.95
Melanie Burns
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
2.91
Brenda Varner
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.82
Shannon Hughes
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
2.81
Donna Davis
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
2.78
Lora Snyder
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
2.77
Laura Ambler
usually #2 Doubles 33%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Debbie Clancy + Teresa Cruz5358% games+7.3% vs expected
Laura Ambler + Melanie Burns4256% games+5.8% vs expected
Lora Snyder + Vania Robinson6257% games+3.1% vs expected
Laura Ambler + Debbie Clancy4158% gamesnot enough data
Mary Batts + Kimberly Franz404 matchesnot enough data
Debbie Clancy + Melanie Burns314 matchesnot enough data
Jill Fritz + Kimberly Franz123 matchesnot enough data
Brenda Varner + Lora Snyder123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Teresa Cruz
27W–8L career · 4 lines in 2026
<1%34%66%
3.56
Mary Batts
30W–18L career · 5 lines in 2026
<1%40%60%
3.54
Kimberly Franz
41W–25L career · no lines in 2026
<1%43%57%
3.53
Jill Fritz
50W–55L career · 4 lines in 2026
<1%51%49%
3.50
3.5
Debbie Clancy
30W–30L career · 5 lines in 2026
<1%72%27%
3.42
3.5
Christina Schulenklopper
17W–12L career · 1 line in 2026
<1%79%21%
3.38
Teri Bramsway
29W–26L career · 2 lines in 2026
10%89%1%
3.18
3
DEBORAH WELLS
30W–13L career · 3 lines in 2026
<1%36%64%
3.05
Vania Robinson
14W–10L career · 2 lines in 2026
<1%50%50%
3.00
Melanie Burns
27W–28L career · 2 lines in 2026
<1%64%36%
2.95
3
Brenda Varner
137W–87L career · 1 line in 2026
<1%74%26%
2.91
Shannon Hughes
22W–16L career · 2 lines in 2026
1%89%10%
2.82
Donna Davis
11W–9L career · 1 line in 2026
1%90%9%
2.81
Lora Snyder
13W–14L career · 1 line in 2026
2%92%6%
2.78
Laura Ambler
18W–11L career · 3 lines in 2026
3%92%5%
2.77

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.