Teams

BH - Lockwood/Jones

2024 B'ham Fall - Adult 18 & Over Women Saturday, 9:00 am · 4.0 Women

13 players · average NTRP 4.14 / ALABAMA

View scouting list →
Schedule2 played
2023-10-25vs VCC - Mikos/WillisWon 10
W#2 DoublesMaggie Misner / Anne Matthews vs Jennifer Mummert / Brandi Israel6-3, 6-2
2023-10-04vs PRC - SteedLost 01
L#3 DoublesMaggie Misner / Kathleen Stallings vs Holly Sherrer / Collier Ogilvie6-4, 5-7, 0-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 4.0 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.83 estimated across 12 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.29
Anne Matthews
published 4.5
4.16
Calli Robinson
published 4.5
4.08
Kaira King
published
3.91
Ellie Adams
published 4
3.89
Maggie Misner
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 4
3.79
Lee Baxter
published
3.76
KC Templeton
published
3.73
Kathleen Stallings
published
3.68
Amber Vaughn
published 4
3.63
Elizabeth Gilmer
published 4
3.63
Abbie Kotarski
published 4
3.46
Kacy Carroll
published
Kim Douglas
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Lee Baxter + KC Templeton4156% games+1.2% vs expected
Anne Matthews + Maggie Misner2350% gamesnot enough data
Lee Baxter + Abbie Kotarski224 matchesnot enough data
Lee Baxter + Calli Robinson314 matchesnot enough data
Anne Matthews + Kathleen Stallings224 matchesnot enough data
Kathleen Stallings + Maggie Misner303 matchesnot enough data
KC Templeton + Elizabeth Gilmer213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4.5
Anne Matthews
14W–11L career · no lines in 2024
1%93%5%
4.29
4.5
Calli Robinson
30W–9L career · no lines in 2024
11%89%<1%
4.16
Kaira King
28W–5L career · no lines in 2024
<1%27%73%
4.08
4
Ellie Adams
4W–5L career · no lines in 2024
<1%75%25%
3.91
4
Maggie Misner
77W–36L career · 2 lines in 2024
<1%80%20%
3.89
Lee Baxter
26W–11L career · no lines in 2024
1%94%5%
3.79
KC Templeton
45W–21L career · no lines in 2024
2%95%3%
3.76
Kathleen Stallings
16W–9L career · no lines in 2024
4%94%2%
3.73
4
Amber Vaughn
18W–18L career · no lines in 2024
8%91%1%
3.68
4
Elizabeth Gilmer
17W–19L career · no lines in 2024
15%85%<1%
3.63
4
Abbie Kotarski
14W–13L career · no lines in 2024
16%84%<1%
3.63
Kacy Carroll
5W–9L career · no lines in 2024
63%37%<1%
3.46
Kim Douglas
3W–2L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.