← Teams

THPRD-Mounts/Rich

2019 Adult 55 & Over · 7.0 Men

8 players · average NTRP 3.08 · USTA/PACIFIC NW / NORTHERN OREGON

View scouting list →
Scouting

Roster averages 2.79 estimated across 5 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

—
Clay Funkhouser
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
2.91
Aaron Bowman
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.90
Michael Rich
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.87
Jim Mounts
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 3
2.78
David Lomartire
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.51
George Scott
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3
—
Jerry Garland
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 0
—
Steve Sanford
usually #1 Doubles 80%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published 0
Results8 ties
2018-11-11Lost 0–3
L#1 DoublesJim Mounts / Paul Stutzman vs Jim Johnston / David Mealey7-5, 7-6
L#2 DoublesDavid Lomartire / Edward Grover vs Keith Westrum / Kevin Semonsen6-2, 6-0
L#3 DoublesAnthony Kershaw / Aaron Bowman vs Douglas Brewer / John Knudson-Martin7-5, 6-1
2018-10-28Lost 1–2
W#1 DoublesJim Mounts / Paul Stutzman vs Calvin Chen / John Knudson-Martin6-4, 4-6, 1-0
L#2 DoublesDavid Lomartire / David Williams vs Jim Johnston / Bruce Baker1-6, 6-3, 1-0
L#3 DoublesAnthony Kershaw / Aaron Bowman vs Frank Brown / Kevin Semonsen6-4, 6-3
2018-10-20Lost 1–2
W#1 DoublesPaul Stutzman / Steve Sanford vs Paul Dugan / Stephen Osborne3-6, 7-6, 1-0
L#2 DoublesCharles Duncan / Clay Funkhouser vs James Stenger / Gerald Chase6-0, 6-2
L#3 DoublesJim Mounts / Anthony Kershaw vs Gary Henin / Robert Lefeber3-6, 6-4, 1-0
2018-10-12Lost 0–3
L#1 DoublesJim Mounts / Charles Duncan vs Tony Humpage / Paul Kerkar6-2, 6-2
L#2 DoublesClay Funkhouser / George Scott vs Chip Burczak / Dave Hall6-1, 6-1
L#3 DoublesAnthony Kershaw / Aaron Bowman vs Matthew Casimo / Jeffrey Bayless6-2, 7-5
2018-10-06Lost 1–2
L#1 DoublesDavid Williams / Steve Sanford vs David Lee / Gary Townsend6-4, 6-4
L#2 DoublesJim Mounts / Charles Duncan vs DuplicateErasmo DuplicateGonzalez / John Gould1-6, 6-3, 1-0
W#3 DoublesAaron Bowman / Edward Grover vs Brian Noll / Shirish Patel6-2, 3-6, 1-0
2018-09-28Lost 0–3
L#1 DoublesSteve Sanford / Paul Stutzman vs Frank Foti / Guy Neal6-3, 6-2
L#2 DoublesMichael Rich / Jerry Garland vs Larry Kaster / Bill Lowblad6-0, 6-3
L#3 DoublesAaron Bowman / George Scott vs Mark Becker / David Ritchie6-2, 6-3
2018-09-21Split 1–1
W#2 DoublesSteve Sanford / David Lomartire vs Jim Lekas / Andrew Smith6-1, 6-3
L#3 DoublesJim Mounts / Edward Grover vs Glenn Eisen / Mark Meyer6-2, 7-6
2018-09-09Lost 0–2
L#1 DoublesSteve Sanford / Paul Stutzman vs Larry Kaster / Bill Lowblad6-4, 6-7, 1-0
L#3 DoublesEdward Grover / George Scott vs Makoto Sakaguchi / Jay Hwang6-3, 7-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits.

3.5
Clay Funkhouser
37W–53L career
not enough data
—
3
Aaron Bowman
30W–58L career
0%93%7%
2.91
3
Michael Rich
45W–77L career
0%95%5%
2.90
3
Jim Mounts
59W–65L career
0%96%4%
2.87
3
David Lomartire
21W–28L career
0%99%1%
2.78
3
George Scott
26W–78L career
35%65%0%
2.51
0
Jerry Garland
5W–18L career
not enough data
—
0
Steve Sanford
31W–35L career
not enough data
—

Three percentages are the year-end projection — chance of moving down, staying, moving up — and the number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.