Teams

EReiter-HR

2025 Eno River Adult 40 & Over · 40 & Over Adult 4.0 Women Day

13 players · average NTRP 3.85 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2025-04-29Won 10
W#1 SinglesJulie Spearman vs Laura Ross6-2, 6-4
2025-04-28vs JWaters-HVCCLost 01
L#1 DoublesJulie Spearman / Erin Reiter vs Meredith Howell / Amy Brisley0-6, 6-7
2025-04-25vs HBrewer-ENOWon 21
W#1 DoublesSharon Huang / Carrie Norry vs Meghan Yancey / Betsy Wood-Ehrenberger6-4, 7-6
W#1 SinglesMary Feger vs Joanna Brooks6-4, 7-5
L#2 DoublesBeth Huebner / Elizabeth Wyngaarden vs Ginny Meier / Erin Swindell5-7, 3-6
2025-04-04vs ALeinbach-CHTCWon 20
W#1 DoublesJulie Spearman / Mary Feger vs Susan Lebowitz / Kristin Lahey6-4, 6-4
W#2 DoublesElizabeth Wyngaarden / Nancee Merritt vs Jeanne Beckley / Diane Birkemo6-0, 6-4
2025-03-21vs HBrewer-ENOWon 21
W#1 DoublesMary Feger / Carrie Couto vs Ginny Meier / Meghan Yancey6-2, 6-4
W#2 DoublesElizabeth Wyngaarden / Susie Post-Rust vs LeAnne Bloedon / Erin Swindell6-2, 4-6, 1-0
L#3 DoublesCarrie Norry / Sharon Huang vs Adrienne Brewer / Heather Brewer2-6, 3-6
2025-03-14vs SShelby-CHCCWon 20
W#2 DoublesCarrie Couto / Mary Feger vs Carey Baddour / Laura Ross4-6, 6-3, 1-0
W#3 DoublesSharon Huang / Carrie Norry vs Sarah Shelby / Susan DeNuzzio6-2, 6-4
2025-03-07vs JWaters-HVCCLost 12
L#1 DoublesCarrie Couto / Mary Feger vs Linsey Hughes / Stacey Burkert6-1, 0-6, 1-0
L#2 DoublesJulie Spearman / Erin Reiter vs Meredith Howell / Amanda Lacoff3-6, 2-6
W#3 DoublesSharon Huang / Susie Post-Rust vs Amy Brisley / Melanie Biese6-1, 6-4
2025-02-28vs ALeinbach-CHTCLost 02
L#1 SinglesSusie Post-Rust vs Amy Hoots1-6, 0-6
L#3 DoublesCarrie Couto / Erin Reiter vs Vicky Arne / Dayna Kelly3-6, 5-7
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 40 & Over Adult 4.0 Women Day have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.57 estimated across 13 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.09
Beth Huebner
published 4
3.96
Mary Feger
usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published 4
3.79
Julie Spearman
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 4
3.65
Susie Post-Rust
usually #1 Singles 33%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.63
Nancee Merritt
published
3.62
Atsuko Duncan
published 4
3.59
Carrie Couto
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published 4
3.58
Melissa Lutz
published
3.45
Elizabeth Wyngaarden
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.39
Erin Reiter
published
3.37
Carrie Norry
usually #1 Doubles 57%, also #3 Doubles 29% · published 3.5
3.15
Brynn Hale
published 3.5
3.12
Cynthia Sundy
published 3.5
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Beth Huebner + Carrie Couto6453% games+8.2% vs expected
Mary Feger + Carrie Couto171354% games+4.1% vs expected
Carrie Couto + Elizabeth Wyngaarden171547% games−0.5% vs expected
Julie Spearman + Carrie Couto12759% games−4.2% vs expected
Mary Feger + Julie Spearman8363% gamesnot enough data
Julie Spearman + Carrie Norry2447% gamesnot enough data
Melissa Lutz + Nancee Merritt213 matchesnot enough data
Mary Feger + Elizabeth Wyngaarden213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Beth Huebner
37W–20L career · no lines in 2025
<1%26%74%
4.09
4
Mary Feger
125W–65L career · 5 lines in 2025
<1%60%40%
3.96
4
Julie Spearman
167W–84L career · 4 lines in 2025
2%91%7%
3.79
4
Susie Post-Rust
81W–93L career · 3 lines in 2025
14%85%1%
3.65
Nancee Merritt
4W–4L career · no lines in 2025
18%81%<1%
3.63
4
Atsuko Duncan
3W–3L career · no lines in 2025
20%80%<1%
3.62
4
Carrie Couto
162W–176L career · 4 lines in 2025
25%74%<1%
3.59
Melissa Lutz
7W–8L career · no lines in 2025
28%71%<1%
3.58
4
Elizabeth Wyngaarden
111W–133L career · 3 lines in 2025
65%35%<1%
3.45
Erin Reiter
1W–6L career · no lines in 2025
78%22%<1%
3.39
3.5
Carrie Norry
82W–65L career · 7 lines in 2025
<1%82%17%
3.37
3.5
Brynn Hale
1W–3L career · no lines in 2025
15%85%1%
3.15
3.5
Cynthia Sundy
2W–6L career · no lines in 2025
20%80%<1%
3.12

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.