Teams

WNCA Duernberger (HRC)

Adult 55 & Over USTA WNC 2026 · 55+ Adult Women 4.0 Sat

12 players · average NTRP 3.70 / NORTH CAROLINA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2026-05-09vs WNCT Walker (Aston Park)Won 21
L#1 DoublesJennifer Hudgens / Yvonne Monet vs Sherrie Voyles / Susan Walker4-6, 6-4, 0-1
W#2 DoublesElaine Grove / Heidi Zehr vs Sallie LaChance / Tracey Walker6-3, 6-4
W#3 DoublesSusan Hoffman / Susan Laborde vs Eileen Cohen / Kathleen Hurley6-2, 6-2
2026-05-04vs WNCJ Sweezey (Aston Park)Lost 03
L#1 DoublesSusan Hoffman / Elaine Grove vs Beth Meacham / Suzanne Henry2-6, 3-6
L#2 DoublesTLynn Gilpin / Linda Terbeek vs Lisa Baugh / Theresa Hash4-6, 4-6
L#3 DoublesJennifer Hudgens / Rhonda Gaudino vs Kathryn Button / Vivian Gibson4-6, 5-7
2026-05-02vs WNCK Haycook (ARC South)Lost 12
L#1 DoublesBeth MacDonald / Heidi Zehr vs Cynthia Beane / Mary B Wilder2-6, 4-6
L#2 DoublesLeanne Groban / Brenda Cook vs Kathy Kinnamon / Donna Loftin2-6, 1-6
W#3 DoublesAmelia Duernberger / Yvonne Monet vs Sarah Corley / Vickie Massey6-3, 6-4
2026-04-18vs WNCJ Sweezey (Aston Park)Lost 03
L#1 DoublesRhonda Gaudino / Linda Terbeek vs Beth Meacham / Nancy Pryately2-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesJennifer Hudgens / Brenda Cook vs Anna Bacher Brown / Shari Rawet4-6, 0-6
L#3 DoublesAmelia Duernberger / Elaine Grove vs Lisa Baugh / Theresa Hash2-6, 6-7
2026-04-11vs WNCK Haycook (ARC South)Won 21
W#1 DoublesLeanne Groban / Susan Laborde vs Mary B Wilder / Mary Ann Wendel7-5, 4-6, 1-0
W#2 DoublesRhonda Gaudino / Linda Terbeek vs Angela Newnam / Donna Loftin5-3
L#3 DoublesKenna Armstrong / Brenda Cook vs Kathy Kinnamon / Vickie Massey4-6, 2-6
2026-04-04vs WNCT Walker (Aston Park)Won 21
L#1 DoublesLinda Terbeek / TLynn Gilpin vs Sherrie Voyles / Susan Sparboe-Derry2-6, 7-6, 0-1
W#2 DoublesHeidi Zehr / Beth MacDonald vs Nancy Duncan / Kathleen Hurley6-3, 7-5
W#3 DoublesAmelia Duernberger / Leanne Groban vs Eileen Cohen / Sallie LaChance6-4, 6-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 55+ Adult Women 4.0 Sat have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.54 estimated across 12 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.76
Yvonne Monet
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
3.74
Beth MacDonald
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 4
3.74
Elaine Grove
usually #1 Doubles 33%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.68
Linda Terbeek
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
3.64
Leanne Groban
usually #3 Doubles 33%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
3.59
Rhonda Gaudino
usually #3 Doubles 33%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
3.51
Amelia Duernberger
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.49
Jennifer Hudgens
usually #1 Doubles 56%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
3.42
TLynn Gilpin
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.36
Heidi Zehr
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.36
Susan Laborde
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
3.19
Kenna Armstrong
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Linda Terbeek + TLynn Gilpin2448% games+15.7% vs expected
Jennifer Hudgens + TLynn Gilpin2456% games+11.2% vs expected
Heidi Zehr + Beth MacDonald2341% gamesnot enough data
Kenna Armstrong + Heidi Zehr123 matchesnot enough data
Yvonne Monet + Leanne Groban213 matchesnot enough data
Jennifer Hudgens + Beth MacDonald213 matchesnot enough data
Jennifer Hudgens + Elaine Grove213 matchesnot enough data
Heidi Zehr + Elaine Grove123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Yvonne Monet
15W–18L career · 2 lines in 2026
2%94%3%
3.76
4
Beth MacDonald
6W–13L career · 2 lines in 2026
3%94%2%
3.74
4
Elaine Grove
12W–9L career · type S · 3 lines in 2026
3%94%2%
3.74
Linda Terbeek
2W–7L career · 4 lines in 2026
8%91%1%
3.68
Leanne Groban
13W–16L career · 3 lines in 2026
14%85%<1%
3.64
Rhonda Gaudino
4W–3L career · 3 lines in 2026
24%75%<1%
3.59
3.5
Amelia Duernberger
6W–11L career · 3 lines in 2026
<1%47%53%
3.51
Jennifer Hudgens
23W–32L career · 9 lines in 2026
<1%54%46%
3.49
3.5
TLynn Gilpin
291W–221L career · 6 lines in 2026
<1%74%26%
3.42
3.5
Heidi Zehr
9W–22L career · 3 lines in 2026
<1%85%15%
3.36
Susan Laborde
2W–5L career · 2 lines in 2026
86%14%<1%
3.36
Kenna Armstrong
2W–5L career · 1 line in 2026
7%92%1%
3.19

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.