Teams

6 Willow Oaks Moehling/Hamlin

2021 Richmond Adult 40 & Over Weekend · Richmond Adult 40 & Over Women 3.0

15 players · average NTRP 3.31 / VIRGINIA

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2021-08-08vs 1 Salisbury Haskin JamisonWon 10
W#1 SinglesDarlene Moehling vs Becky McNeer6-4, 6-6
2021-07-31Lost 01
L#1 SinglesDarlene Moehling vs Kerry Kablack6-7, 4-3, 0-1
2021-07-25vs 3 ACAC Callaghan/GrangerWon 10
W#2 DoublesDarlene Moehling / Heather Drew vs Jackie Granger / Nikki Callaghan6-1, 6-1
2021-07-17vs 4 Avalon GhitaWon 10
W#1 SinglesDarlene Moehling vs Christy Molnar6-7, 6-3, 1-0
2021-07-10vs 2 Woodlake JolinskiWon 10
W#1 SinglesDarlene Moehling vs Irene Shepherd6-1, 6-0
2021-06-12vs 5 Avalon LuchsingerWon 10
W#1 SinglesDarlene Moehling vs Cristin Traylor6-0, 6-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Richmond Adult 40 & Over Women 3.0 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.98 estimated across 14 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.88
Darlene Moehling
usually #1 Singles 83%, also #2 Doubles 17% · published 4
3.38
Heather Drew
published 3.5
3.37
Cheri Stringer
published 3.5
3.10
Anne-Marie Anderson
published 3.5
3.04
Sule Sauvigne
published
2.97
Joy Chenault
published
2.88
Kelly Beazley
published
2.82
Stacy Curtis
published
2.82
Anne Scher
published 3
2.81
Kristin Hamlin
published
2.75
2.66
Beth Kelly
published 3
2.63
2.57
Katie Bressler
published
Nikki Powell
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Stacy Curtis + Catherine Matawaran3343% games−10.4% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Darlene Moehling
113W–77L career · 6 lines in 2021
<1%81%19%
3.88
3.5
Heather Drew
13W–11L career · no lines in 2021
<1%83%17%
3.38
3.5
Cheri Stringer
9W–6L career · no lines in 2021
<1%84%16%
3.37
3.5
Anne-Marie Anderson
3W–4L career · no lines in 2021
22%78%<1%
3.10
Sule Sauvigne
10W–14L career · no lines in 2021
38%62%<1%
3.04
Joy Chenault
2W–2L career · no lines in 2021
<1%58%42%
2.97
Kelly Beazley
10W–9L career · no lines in 2021
<1%83%17%
2.88
Stacy Curtis
3W–4L career · no lines in 2021
1%91%9%
2.82
3
Anne Scher
17W–17L career · no lines in 2021
1%91%8%
2.82
Kristin Hamlin
17W–20L career · no lines in 2021
1%92%7%
2.81
3
Catherine Matawaran
16W–14L career · no lines in 2021
3%95%3%
2.75
3
Beth Kelly
4W–9L career · no lines in 2021
11%88%<1%
2.66
3
Colette Christianson
4W–3L career · no lines in 2021
15%84%<1%
2.63
Katie Bressler
9W–13L career · no lines in 2021
28%71%<1%
2.57
Nikki Powell
5W–5L career · no lines in 2021
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.