Teams

Brevard - TTC/Flores

2022 Brevard Combo 18 & Over · 8.5 Men

9 players · average NTRP 4.29 / REGION_4

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2022-08-11Won 10
W#3 DoublesDaniel Flores / Zachary Eichholz vs N/A6-0, 6-0
2022-07-28Won 10
W#1 DoublesZachary Eichholz / Thomas Eskridge vs Casey Coffey / Billy Specht6-3, 6-3
2022-07-21vs Kiwi -MulhernWon 20
W#1 DoublesBruno Pintchovski Rodrigues / Daniel Flores vs Joel Mayer / Gregory Hughes6-2, 6-1
W#2 DoublesZachary Eichholz / Thomas Eskridge vs Rafael Reyes / Keith Alvares6-4, 6-1
2022-07-07vs Singleton -GarzaWon 10
W#1 DoublesBruno Pintchovski Rodrigues / Thomas Eskridge vs Michael Girardi / Anthony Kalman6-1, 6-4
2022-06-30vs Kiwi -MulhernWon 21
L#1 DoublesZachary Eichholz / Brett Lindenberg vs Stephen Ramsey / Nathan Dickens5-7, 2-6
W#2 DoublesJames Clark / Norman Hosan vs Benjamin Smith / Joel Mayer6-4, 5-7, 1-0
W#3 DoublesBruno Pintchovski Rodrigues / Thomas Eskridge vs Eric Mulhern / Rob Apsey6-1, 2-6, 1-0
2022-06-16vs Singleton -GarzaWon 21
W#1 DoublesDaniel Flores / Zachary Eichholz vs Casey Coffey / Billy Specht6-2, 7-5
W#2 DoublesBruno Pintchovski Rodrigues / Elliott Hulscher vs Chris Sharp / Jason Isla6-3, 6-2
L#3 DoublesJames Clark / Norman Hosan vs Michael Girardi / Jake Geyer6-4, 4-6, 0-1
2022-06-09vs Kiwi -MulhernSplit 11
W#1 DoublesZachary Eichholz / Elliott Hulscher vs Gregg Greenwald / Keith Alvares6-0, 6-4
L#2 DoublesBruno Pintchovski Rodrigues / Norman Hosan vs Nathan Dickens / Benjamin Smith4-6, 3-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 8.5 Men have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 4.00 estimated across 7 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.28
Eric Eichholz
published 4.5
4.26
Zachary Eichholz
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 17% · published 4.5
4.13
Bruno Pintchovski Rodrigues
usually #2 Doubles 40%, also #1 Doubles 40% · published 4.5
4.02
Daniel Flores
published 4.5
3.84
Elliott Hulscher
published 4
3.78
Brett Lindenberg
published 4
3.67
Norman Hosan
usually #2 Doubles 38%, also #1 Doubles 38% · published 4
Thomas Eskridge
published
Toney McIntosh
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Bruno Pintchovski Rodrigues + Zachary Eichholz5445% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4.5
Eric Eichholz
3W–1L career · no lines in 2022
2%94%4%
4.28
4.5
Zachary Eichholz
83W–46L career · 6 lines in 2022
2%94%3%
4.26
4.5
Bruno Pintchovski Rodrigues
98W–57L career · 5 lines in 2022
16%84%<1%
4.13
4.5
Daniel Flores
19W–7L career · no lines in 2022
44%55%<1%
4.02
4
Elliott Hulscher
89W–52L career · no lines in 2022
<1%89%11%
3.84
4
Brett Lindenberg
2W–2L career · no lines in 2022
2%94%5%
3.78
4
Norman Hosan
98W–112L career · 8 lines in 2022
10%90%1%
3.67
Thomas Eskridge
1W–0L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
Toney McIntosh
66W–20L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.