← Teams

GLVR-Crowley/Daoud

2022 Adult 40 & Over · 3.0 Women

8 players · average NTRP 3.19 · USTA/PACIFIC NW / NORTHERN OREGON

View scouting list →
Scouting

Roster averages 2.96 estimated across 7 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.26
Miriam Habafy
usually #1 Singles 43%, also #3 Doubles 43% · published 3.5
3.24
Jennifer Pultz
usually #1 Doubles 38%, also #2 Doubles 38% · published 3.5
3.22
Penny Langhammer
published 3.5
2.84
Yone Akagi
usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published 3
—
Kate Maher
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 3
2.73
Amy Carolan
published 3
2.73
Kathleen Crowley
usually #2 Doubles 80%, also #3 Doubles 20% · published 3
2.71
Katja Daoud
usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published 3
Results8 ties
2022-06-11Won 2–1
L#1 DoublesKate Quisling / Yone Akagi vs Susan Bradley / Dana Kitchin6-4, 6-1
W#2 DoublesJennifer Pultz / Kathleen Crowley vs Marjorie Brinck / Stephanie Hoover6-2, 6-1
W#3 DoublesLuz Zanavich / Kate Maher vs Qin Lian / MaryAnn Nickel6-2, 6-2
2022-06-05Won 3–0
W#1 DoublesYone Akagi / Kate Quisling vs Delena Palena / Donna Weyand6-3, 7-5
W#1 SinglesMiriam Habafy vs Cyndi Johnson6-4, 6-1
W#2 DoublesKathleen Crowley / Katja Daoud vs Margaret Huck / Laura Kaufman6-2, 6-1
2022-05-22Lost 0–2
L#1 DoublesKathy Cooke / Katja Daoud vs Heidi Palena / Patricia Nierenberg6-2, 6-4
L#2 DoublesKathleen Crowley / Kate Maher vs Teresa Darling / Rebecca Griffith6-3, 6-2
2022-05-14Won 2–0
W#1 DoublesKate Quisling / Yone Akagi vs Valerie Neill / Christina Melander6-3, 6-7, 1-0
W#2 DoublesKate Maher / Kathy Cooke vs Barbara Lolich / Shannon Davis6-4, 1-6, 1-0
2022-05-07Lost 1–2
L#1 DoublesKathy Cooke / Katja Daoud vs Edwardeen Hilts / Courtney Laing6-3, 6-0
L#1 SinglesJennifer Pultz vs Sara Vanderhoff6-3, 6-1
W#2 DoublesKate Quisling / Kate Maher vs Melissa Jacobs / Desiree Bliss6-4, 4-6, 1-0
2022-04-24Won 2–1
W#1 DoublesMiriam Habafy / Jennifer Pultz vs Christina Melander / Valerie Neill6-2, 6-3
L#2 DoublesKathy Cooke / Kate Maher vs Shannon Davis / Joanna Asia Wagner6-1, 7-5
W#3 DoublesKathleen Crowley / Yone Akagi vs Rose Lee / Angela Diaz de Leon6-2, 6-0
2022-04-17Won 2–1
W#1 DoublesKatja Daoud / Jennifer Pultz vs Shannon Darrow / Autumn Bunch3-6, 6-4, 1-0
W#1 SinglesMiriam Habafy vs Sumner Brooks2-6, 6-0, 1-0
L#2 DoublesYone Akagi / Kathleen Crowley vs Melanie DeSilva / Lillian Lee6-7, 6-4, 1-0
2022-04-09Won 2–1
L#1 DoublesJennifer Pultz / Kate Quisling vs Delena Palena / Tamara Phillips7-6, 6-4
W#2 DoublesKatja Daoud / Kathy Cooke vs Jill Watson / Barbara Pasmore3-6, 6-3, 1-0
W#3 DoublesLuz Zanavich / Kate Maher vs Laura Kaufman / Donna Weyand1-6, 6-3, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits.

3.5
Miriam Habafy
105W–82L career
0%99%0%
3.26
3.5
Jennifer Pultz
112W–67L career
1%99%0%
3.24
3.5
Penny Langhammer
61W–36L career
2%97%0%
3.22
3
Yone Akagi
66W–52L career
0%98%2%
2.84
3
Kate Maher
36W–11L career
not enough data
—
3
Amy Carolan
30W–27L career
1%99%0%
2.73
3
Kathleen Crowley
60W–51L career
5%94%1%
2.73
3
Katja Daoud
71W–70L career
2%98%0%
2.71

Three percentages are the year-end projection — chance of moving down, staying, moving up — and the number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.