Teams

LEBTC GOLD

2021 USTA ADULT 18 & OVER - DEN · WOMEN 3.0 - 18 & OVER

9 players · average NTRP 3.36 / COLORADO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2021-06-04vs CCC GREENWon 41
L#1 DoublesIngrid Burke / Christine Gish vs Amy Noverr / Lindsey Sittko3-6, 2-6
W#1 SinglesMadison Irvine vs Brooke Wagner6-3, 6-4
W#2 DoublesKristina Schomer / Marlyse Aguirre vs Ymmy Carrington / Melita Faith6-1, 6-4
W#2 SinglesEmily Dreyer vs Julie Shaw6-3, 4-6, 1-0
W#3 DoublesKelly Crawley / Sarah Nelson vs Jackie Scherer / Nicole Poulos6-2, 6-4
2021-06-03vs CK BLUELost 23
W#1 DoublesSarah Nelson / Laurien Hottman vs Amee Auberry / Renee Martinez6-3, 6-4
L#1 SinglesMadison Irvine vs Mallory McCasky2-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesKelly Crawley / Ingrid Burke vs Nancy Railey-Borchelt / Leann Koontz5-7, 3-6
L#2 SinglesChristine Gish vs Su Zemla1-6, 1-6
W#3 DoublesMarlyse Aguirre / Emily Dreyer vs Lisa Massicotte / Marie Grossman6-0, 6-2
2021-05-27vs PH GREENLost 14
W#1 DoublesKristen Swenson / Laurien Hottman vs Lori Silliman / Libby Conlin6-4, 7-5
L#1 SinglesEmily Dreyer vs Tracy Wells0-6, 3-6
L#2 DoublesMarlyse Aguirre / Christine Gish vs Beth Wright / Colleen Powell3-6, 3-6
L#2 SinglesMadison Irvine vs Prairie Robinson6-7, 4-6
L#3 DoublesKelly Crawley / Kristina Schomer vs Lisa Dreiling / Jennifer Parsons6-4, 4-6, 0-1
2021-05-24vs BCST BLUEWon 32
W#1 DoublesMarlyse Aguirre / Laurien Hottman vs Michelle Harvey / Judith Wallach6-2, 6-0
L#1 SinglesMadison Irvine vs Susan Lee3-6, 3-6
W#2 DoublesKelly Crawley / Kristen Swenson vs Brett Gnadt / Kimberly Lange6-3, 7-5
L#2 SinglesKristina Schomer vs Emily Walkup4-6, 6-7
W#3 DoublesSarah Nelson / Christine Gish vs Janis Owens / Clara Mizenko7-6, 1-6, 1-0
2021-05-10vs BM BLUEWon 50
W#1 DoublesKelly Crawley / Marlyse Aguirre vs Amy Geist / Millie Knox6-4, 6-4
W#1 SinglesMadison Irvine vs Brittany Puster6-0, 6-2
W#2 DoublesKristen Swenson / Sarah Nelson vs Dawn Cominsky / Jodie Thompson6-1, 6-7, 1-0
W#2 SinglesKristina Schomer vs Jane Carlson6-0, 6-3
W#3 DoublesLaurien Hottman / Ingrid Burke vs Brenda Sears / MacKenzie McCoy6-1, 6-3
2021-05-01vs KC GREENWon 41
W#1 DoublesKristen Swenson / Laurien Hottman vs Deven Farris / Kelly Mair6-1, 6-2
W#1 SinglesEmily Dreyer vs Elizabeth Crites3-6, 6-3, 1-0
L#2 DoublesMarlyse Aguirre / Ingrid Burke vs Jennifer Manta / Alicia Hovland2-6, 4-6
W#2 SinglesMadison Irvine vs Gina Akins3-6, 6-4, 1-0
W#3 DoublesKelly Crawley / Sarah Nelson vs Julie Swint / Christie Mann6-4, 6-4
2021-04-26vs KC BLUEWon 32
W#1 DoublesSarah Nelson / Ingrid Burke vs Carissa Hollander / Nathalia Urbano6-2, 6-0
L#1 SinglesMadison Irvine vs Susanna Evans1-6, 1-6
W#2 DoublesEmily Dreyer / Marlyse Aguirre vs Christine Angelini / Ashley Barto6-2, 6-4
L#2 SinglesKristen Swenson vs AMY CLARKE4-6, 3-6
W#3 DoublesKristina Schomer / Laurien Hottman vs Lay Chan / Cheryl Amador6-1, 6-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for WOMEN 3.0 - 18 & OVER have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.20 estimated across 8 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.66
Laurien Hottman
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.65
Kelly Crawley
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.53
Marlyse Aguirre
usually #2 Doubles 57%, also #1 Doubles 29% · published 3.5
3.45
Kristen Swenson
usually #2 Doubles 40%, also #1 Doubles 40% · published
2.93
Madison Irvine
usually #1 Singles 71%, also #2 Singles 29% · published 3
2.89
Christine Gish
usually #3 Doubles 25%, also #2 Singles 25% · published 3
2.80
Emily Dreyer
usually #1 Singles 40%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published 3
2.66
Ingrid Burke
usually #1 Doubles 40%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published 3
Kristina Schomer
usually #3 Doubles 40%, also #2 Singles 40% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Marlyse Aguirre + Laurien Hottman13365% games+12.2% vs expected
Kristen Swenson + Marlyse Aguirre9165% games+7.5% vs expected
Kristen Swenson + Laurien Hottman18563% games+6.6% vs expected
Laurien Hottman + Kelly Crawley11261% games+3.5% vs expected
Marlyse Aguirre + Kelly Crawley4446% games−1.1% vs expected
Emily Dreyer + Marlyse Aguirre404 matchesnot enough data
Kristina Schomer + Laurien Hottman404 matchesnot enough data
Kristina Schomer + Kelly Crawley134 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Laurien Hottman
175W–49L career · 6 lines in 2021
11%89%<1%
3.66
4
Kelly Crawley
137W–52L career · 6 lines in 2021
12%88%<1%
3.65
3.5
Marlyse Aguirre
115W–44L career · 7 lines in 2021
<1%41%59%
3.53
Kristen Swenson
78W–23L career · 5 lines in 2021
<1%66%34%
3.45
3
Madison Irvine
38W–39L career · 7 lines in 2021
<1%70%30%
2.93
3
Christine Gish
38W–33L career · 4 lines in 2021
<1%81%19%
2.89
3
Emily Dreyer
68W–83L career · 5 lines in 2021
1%93%6%
2.80
3
Ingrid Burke
34W–42L career · type A · 5 lines in 2021
11%89%<1%
2.66
Kristina Schomer
39W–11L career · 5 lines in 2021
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.