Teams

GOLDMAN TC CW5.5A

2025 COMBO · Women 5.5

21 players · average NTRP 2.90 / NO. CALIFORNIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →

Flight standings for Women 5.5 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.68 estimated across 18 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.21
Jessica Pfannenstiel
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published
3.14
Kelly Alberta
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.03
Helen Vasquez
usually #1 Doubles 57%, also #3 Doubles 29% · published
3.02
Elizabeth Kao
published
2.81
Michelle Mah
published
2.74
Mary Kane
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
2.73
Maggie Murray
published
2.73
Mimi Nguyen
published
2.70
Alyson Murphy
published 3
2.69
Ann Capitan
published 3
2.59
Jeri Chu
published
2.53
Amy Gregg
published 3
2.50
Joan Sills
published
2.49
Barbara Bernard
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.48
Karin Nelson
published
2.37
Marina Rosso
published
2.35
Irina Ushach
published
2.17
Amy Ashcroft
published 2.5
Nicole Murphy
published
Victoria Zaroff
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Maggie Murray + Marina Rosso3355% games+4.8% vs expected
Jessica Pfannenstiel + Kelly Alberta6261% games+3.5% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Jessica Pfannenstiel
20W–6L career · 4 lines in 2025
<1%7%93%
3.21
Kelly Alberta
27W–11L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%16%84%
3.14
Helen Vasquez
16W–9L career · 7 lines in 2025
<1%42%58%
3.03
Elizabeth Kao
10W–8L career · no lines in 2025
<1%45%55%
3.02
Michelle Mah
5W–7L career · no lines in 2025
1%90%9%
2.81
Mary Kane
16W–10L career · 1 line in 2025
4%93%3%
2.74
Maggie Murray
8W–9L career · no lines in 2025
5%92%3%
2.73
Mimi Nguyen
5W–13L career · no lines in 2025
5%92%3%
2.73
3
Alyson Murphy
3W–0L career · no lines in 2025
8%91%2%
2.70
3
Ann Capitan
2W–2L career · no lines in 2025
9%90%1%
2.69
Jeri Chu
1W–4L career · no lines in 2025
26%74%<1%
2.59
3
Amy Gregg
7W–14L career · type A · no lines in 2025
42%58%<1%
2.53
Joan Sills
1W–7L career · no lines in 2025
51%49%<1%
2.50
3
Barbara Bernard
1W–3L career · type S · 1 line in 2025
53%47%<1%
2.49
Karin Nelson
2W–8L career · no lines in 2025
56%44%<1%
2.48
Marina Rosso
8W–9L career · no lines in 2025
83%17%<1%
2.37
Irina Ushach
2W–7L career · no lines in 2025
0%86%14%
2.35
2.5
Amy Ashcroft
2W–4L career · no lines in 2025
0%99%1%
2.17
Kristy Nelson Leffers
0W–2L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Nicole Murphy
3W–1L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Victoria Zaroff
0W–1L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.