Teams

Butorac/Memphis

2025 Adult 40 & Over-Memphis · 4.5 Men 40 & over

14 players · average NTRP 4.38 / TENNESSEE

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2025-05-10vs Gardner/MemphisSplit 11
W#1 DoublesTristan Jackson / Peter Monaghan vs Stephen Mansour / Tim Whitehorn6-1, 6-3
L#1 SinglesJohn Butorac vs Chris Taylor2-6, 1-6
2025-04-24vs Gardner/MemphisLost 04
L#1 DoublesDaniel Davis / Tu Pham vs John Malmo / Thomas Hyle3-6, 3-6
L#1 SinglesJason Cousar vs Greg Thompson1-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesKeith Rice / John Gleysteen vs Dale Thompson / Klaus Schmidt6-2, 2-6, 0-1
L#3 DoublesNeil Weston / Jonathan Laman vs Hamed Yessoufou / John Gardner5-7, 1-6
2025-04-19vs Gardner/MemphisLost 05
L#1 DoublesDaniel Davis / Tu Pham vs Thomas Hyle / Jeremy Park1-6, 1-6
L#1 SinglesJon Nestler vs Peter Abrams0-6, 4-6
L#2 DoublesBenjamin Tull / James Dye vs Stephen Mansour / Dale Thompson2-6, 0-6
L#3 DoublesJohn Butorac / Keith Rice vs Lucas Elijovich / Hamed Yessoufou4-6, 3-6
L#4 DoublesTristan Jackson / Neil Weston vs John Gardner / Andrew David3-6, 1-6
2025-04-08vs Gardner/MemphisLost 05
L#1 DoublesDaniel Davis / E B Smythe vs Andrew David / Hamed Yessoufou5-7, 2-6
L#1 SinglesJohn Gleysteen vs Chris Taylor2-6, 3-6
L#2 DoublesTu Pham / Dan McEwan vs Santiago Arbelaez / John Malmo2-6, 2-6
L#3 DoublesKeith Rice / J R Cagle vs Lee Mesaris / Greg Thompson4-6, 0-6
L#4 DoublesNeil Weston / Jason Cousar vs Nick Longsworth / Klaus Schmidt7-5, 0-6, 0-1
2025-03-30vs Gardner/MemphisSplit 22
L#1 SinglesJohn Gleysteen vs Peter Abrams1-6, 2-6
W#2 DoublesDan McEwan / Peter Monaghan vs Lee Mesaris / Lucas Elijovich3-6, 6-4, 1-0
L#3 DoublesE B Smythe / Tristan Jackson vs Jeremy Park / Stephen Mansour1-6, 5-7
W#4 DoublesJason Cousar / Jonathan Laman vs Nick Longsworth / Tim Whitehorn6-2, 6-4
2025-03-25vs Gardner/MemphisLost 13
L#1 DoublesDan McEwan / Peter Monaghan vs Thomas Hyle / Dale Thompson3-6, 3-6
L#1 SinglesJon Nestler vs Chris Taylor6-4, 1-6, 0-1
L#2 DoublesJohn Butorac / E B Smythe vs Santiago Arbelaez / John Gardner2-6, 3-6
W#4 DoublesTristan Jackson / J R Cagle vs Lucas Elijovich / Jeremy Park6-4, 6-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 4.5 Men 40 & over have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.97 estimated across 10 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

Benjamin Tull
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 4.5
Dan McEwan
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 4.5
4.17
Peter Monaghan
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
4.09
Jonathan Laman
usually #3 Doubles 33%, also #4 Doubles 33% · published
4.06
Tristan Jackson
usually #4 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published
4.05
Jon Nestler
usually #1 Singles 100% · published
3.99
E B Smythe
usually #3 Doubles 33%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 4.5
3.97
Jason Cousar
usually #4 Doubles 40%, also #1 Singles 40% · published
3.94
John Gleysteen
usually #1 Singles 40%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published
3.85
John Butorac
usually #3 Doubles 33%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
3.82
Keith Rice
usually #3 Doubles 57%, also #1 Doubles 29% · published
3.81
Neil Weston
usually #2 Doubles 33%, also #4 Doubles 33% · published
J R Cagle
usually #1 Doubles 38%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published 4
Tu Pham
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

John Gleysteen + Keith Rice2354% gamesnot enough data
Keith Rice + Neil Weston3253% gamesnot enough data
Tristan Jackson + Neil Weston123 matchesnot enough data
John Gleysteen + Neil Weston213 matchesnot enough data
John Gleysteen + John Butorac123 matchesnot enough data
Dan McEwan + Peter Monaghan123 matchesnot enough data
Keith Rice + John Butorac123 matchesnot enough data
E B Smythe + John Butorac123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4.5
Benjamin Tull
1W–4L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data
4.5
Dan McEwan
2W–3L career · 3 lines in 2025
not enough data
Peter Monaghan
4W–7L career · 3 lines in 2025
10%89%<1%
4.17
Jonathan Laman
36W–11L career · 6 lines in 2025
<1%25%75%
4.09
Tristan Jackson
15W–27L career · 4 lines in 2025
32%68%<1%
4.06
Jon Nestler
9W–14L career · 2 lines in 2025
35%65%<1%
4.05
4.5
E B Smythe
2W–8L career · 3 lines in 2025
54%46%<1%
3.99
Jason Cousar
33W–13L career · 5 lines in 2025
<1%60%40%
3.97
John Gleysteen
44W–24L career · 5 lines in 2025
<1%66%34%
3.94
John Butorac
24W–31L career · 3 lines in 2025
<1%87%13%
3.85
Keith Rice
27W–25L career · 7 lines in 2025
1%91%9%
3.82
Neil Weston
15W–15L career · 6 lines in 2025
1%92%7%
3.81
4
J R Cagle
18W–14L career · 8 lines in 2025
not enough data
Tu Pham
4W–11L career · 3 lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.