Teams

Fisher/Nashville

2026 Mixed 40 & Over - Nashville · 3.0 Mixed - Saturday

16 players · average NTRP 3.00 / TENNESSEE

View scouting list →
Schedule5 played
2026-07-11vs Moss/Dawson/NashvilleLost 03
L#1 DoublesBrooke Vane / John Orum vs Megan de la O / Louis Alessi1-6, 3-6
L#2 DoublesHolly Fisher / Jose Antequera vs Elisa Hill / Ryan Moss2-6, 2-6
L#3 DoublesMegan Palmer / Brian Barnett vs Jelena Sanford / CJ Monte2-6, 6-7
2026-06-27vs Moss/Dawson/NashvilleLost 03
L#1 DoublesRob Manuel / Noell Rembert vs Theo Smith / Traci Gilbert-Stafford2-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesMark Whitehead / Lisa Rota vs Jelena Sanford / Nicholas Cook1-6, 3-6
L#3 DoublesDavid Schenkel / Holly Fisher vs Connor Horn / Cynthia Madson2-6, 0-6
2026-06-25vs Moss/Dawson/NashvilleLost 03
L#1 DoublesDaniel Tan / Noell Rembert vs Theo Smith / Kelly Kirby-Piovarcy4-6, 7-6, 1-0
L#2 DoublesLisa Rota / John Mann vs Kelly Dawson / Jerry Sims1-6, 4-6
L#3 DoublesRaymond Clark / Laura Hardy vs Jelena Sanford / CJ Monte1-6, 0-6
2026-06-17vs Moss/Dawson/NashvilleLost 03
L#1 DoublesHolly Fisher / Jose Antequera vs Connor Horn / Cynthia Madson7-5, 3-6, 1-0
L#2 DoublesJohn Orum / Lisa Rota vs Ben Sanford / Jelena Sanford2-6, 2-6
L#3 DoublesMegan Palmer / Gabriel Harr vs Nicholas Cook / Elisa Hill0-6, 2-6
2026-06-06vs Moss/Dawson/NashvilleLost 03
L#1 DoublesRob Manuel / Tara Platt vs Louis Alessi / Traci Gilbert-Stafford1-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesDavid Schenkel / Holly Fisher vs Jerry Sims / Megan de la O6-2, 1-6, 0-1
L#3 DoublesJeff Cochran / Megan Palmer vs Ryan Moss / Kelly Kirby-Piovarcy1-6, 1-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings1 teams · 3.0 Mixed - Saturday
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1Fisher/Nashville0501530177

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.71 estimated across 11 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.06
Holly Fisher
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published
3.00
David Schenkel
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 3
2.96
Noell Rembert
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
2.90
Daniel Tan
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.75
Brooke Vane
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.69
Raymond Clark
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
2.61
John Mann
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
2.61
Lisa Rota
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
2.59
Laura Hardy
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
2.35
Gabriel Harr
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
2.27
Megan Palmer
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Jeff Cochran
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
John Orum
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
Jose Antequera
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
Mark Whitehead
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Rob Manuel
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Holly Fisher
40W–37L career · 4 lines in 2026
<1%33%67%
3.06
3
David Schenkel
3W–6L career · type S · 2 lines in 2026
<1%50%50%
3.00
Noell Rembert
13W–13L career · 2 lines in 2026
<1%60%40%
2.96
3
Daniel Tan
12W–13L career · 1 line in 2026
<1%75%25%
2.90
3
Brooke Vane
13W–25L career · 1 line in 2026
4%93%3%
2.75
Raymond Clark
2W–13L career · 1 line in 2026
9%90%1%
2.69
John Mann
2W–16L career · 1 line in 2026
21%78%<1%
2.61
Lisa Rota
5W–17L career · 3 lines in 2026
21%78%<1%
2.61
Laura Hardy
0W–4L career · 1 line in 2026
25%74%<1%
2.59
Gabriel Harr
0W–7L career · 1 line in 2026
87%13%<1%
2.35
Megan Palmer
8W–16L career · 3 lines in 2026
0%95%5%
2.27
Jeff Cochran
1W–2L career · 1 line in 2026
not enough data
John Orum
0W–5L career · 2 lines in 2026
not enough data
Jose Antequera
4W–5L career · 2 lines in 2026
not enough data
Mark Whitehead
0W–6L career · 1 line in 2026
not enough data
Rob Manuel
2W–4L career · 2 lines in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.