Teams

CC-LLW-Avila Gordon

2023 CC MXD DOUBLES 40 & OVER · CC USTA MXD 8.0 40 & OVER

14 players · average NTRP 4.17 / SO.CALIFORNIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule3 played
2023-09-09Won 10
W#1 DoublesMichelle Adam / Ken Johnston vs N/A6-0, 6-0
2023-08-06vs CC-SLOCC Ricci MXD 8.0Lost 01
L#2 DoublesMichael Stanton / Michelle Adam vs Laura Winkenbach / Jason Vanclef2-6, 3-6
2023-05-20vs CC-SLOCC Ricci MXD 8.0Lost 01
L#3 DoublesMichelle Adam / Steve Gordon vs Amy Stets / Kirk Vaughn6-7, 2-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for CC USTA MXD 8.0 40 & OVER have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.71 estimated across 11 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.31
Teresa Downey
published
4.29
Andrew Sharp
published 4.5
3.84
Marty Crider
published
3.77
Dana Evangelista
published 4
3.76
Shannon Dossa
published
3.76
Stephen Lakowske
published
3.55
Michelle Adam
usually #3 Doubles 33%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.50
Patty Lopez
published
3.39
Lisa Corrente
published
3.32
Steve Gordon
published
3.28
Karen Gordon
published
Ken Johnston
published
Lynette Branch
published
Michael Stanton
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Karen Gordon + Shannon Dossa123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Teresa Downey
5W–2L career · no lines in 2023
1%90%9%
4.31
4.5
Andrew Sharp
7W–4L career · type T · no lines in 2023
2%92%6%
4.29
Marty Crider
13W–2L career · no lines in 2023
1%87%12%
3.84
4
Dana Evangelista
3W–10L career · no lines in 2023
3%92%5%
3.77
Shannon Dossa
35W–31L career · no lines in 2023
3%92%5%
3.76
Stephen Lakowske
30W–24L career · no lines in 2023
3%93%4%
3.76
4
Michelle Adam
67W–61L career · 3 lines in 2023
35%65%<1%
3.55
Patty Lopez
4W–5L career · no lines in 2023
50%50%<1%
3.50
Lisa Corrente
13W–13L career · no lines in 2023
<1%79%21%
3.39
Steve Gordon
18W–15L career · no lines in 2023
1%89%10%
3.32
Karen Gordon
28W–28L career · no lines in 2023
2%92%6%
3.28
Ken Johnston
12W–4L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Lynette Branch
1W–2L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Michael Stanton
4W–2L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.