Teams

Bainbridge/Thomas

2023 Flint River USTA MXD 18 & Over - Summer · MXD 7.0

12 players · average NTRP 3.50 / GEORGIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule5 played
2023-08-05vs Flint River/Carol ShiverWon 20
W#1 DoublesDarrell Cox / Niki Cox vs Carol Shiver / Craig Moore4-6, 3-2
W#3 DoublesAmy Thomas / Joe McGlincy vs Bobby York / Cindy Anglin6-3, 6-4
2023-07-19Lost 01
L#1 DoublesJoe McGlincy / Susie Hartzog vs Bobby York / Kelley Corbari7-5, 3-6, 0-1
2023-07-17Lost 01
L#1 DoublesDarrell Cox / Niki Cox vs Becky Bush / Greyson Shiver5-7, 1-6
2023-06-11Lost 01
L#2 DoublesJoe McGlincy / Susie Hartzog vs Bobby York / Kelley Corbari3-6, 6-4, 0-1
2023-06-04vs Flint River/Carol ShiverWon 10
W#2 DoublesJoe McGlincy / Susie Hartzog vs Craig Moore / April Bush6-3, 6-3
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for MXD 7.0 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.29 estimated across 9 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.65
Thomas Barber
published
3.53
Stephen Mayfield
published
3.38
Leigh Cooper
published
3.37
Niki Cox
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.35
Susie Hartzog
published
3.26
Joe McGlincy
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
Darrell Cox
published 3.5
3.07
Royce Cannington
published
3.07
April Powell
published 3.5
2.97
Melanie Feliz
published
Kent Forrester
published
Vic McNease
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Joe McGlincy + Niki Cox5748% games−1.4% vs expected
Leigh Cooper + Niki Cox8156% games−3.1% vs expected
Stephen Mayfield + Joe McGlincy044 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Thomas Barber
4W–6L career · no lines in 2023
14%85%1%
3.65
Stephen Mayfield
3W–13L career · no lines in 2023
42%58%<1%
3.53
Leigh Cooper
38W–18L career · no lines in 2023
<1%81%19%
3.38
3.5
Niki Cox
51W–37L career · 2 lines in 2023
<1%81%18%
3.37
Susie Hartzog
6W–1L career · no lines in 2023
1%86%14%
3.35
3.5
Joe McGlincy
74W–68L career · 4 lines in 2023
3%93%4%
3.26
3.5
Darrell Cox
1W–1L career · type S · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Royce Cannington
1W–2L career · no lines in 2023
>99%<1%<1%
3.07
3.5
April Powell
5W–10L career · no lines in 2023
32%68%<1%
3.07
Melanie Feliz
1W–3L career · no lines in 2023
<1%58%42%
2.97
Kent Forrester
1W–0L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Vic McNease
1W–1L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.