Teams

HCC - R. Helme

2026 Hillsborough Mixed 40 & Over · 9.0 Mixed 40 and Over

17 players · average NTRP 4.41 / REGION_3

View scouting list →
Schedule5 played
2026-03-15vs Florida/Orsini/40&Over9.0XDLost 02
L#1 DoublesEmil Novak / Nina Mortazavi vs Jeffrey Stern / Lya Kushnirovich6-4, 4-6, 0-1
L#2 DoublesRichard Helme / Angie Jones vs Ross van Boven / Margaret Roset0-6, 0-6
2026-03-08vs Florida/Orsini/40&Over9.0XDLost 03
L#1 DoublesRichard Helme / Angie Jones vs Lya Kushnirovich / Rogerio Bigio2-6, 0-6
L#2 DoublesElizabeth Baldwin / Hiren Bhatt vs Stephanie Means / Pedro Franco Byrne0-6, 6-4, 0-1
L#3 DoublesEmil Novak / Christina Dausch vs Rebecca Evangelista / Matthew Schnell4-6, 2-6
2026-03-01vs Florida/Orsini/40&Over9.0XDLost 12
L#1 DoublesMike Moenter / Judi Alford vs Manuel Alvarez / Margaret Roset4-6, 4-6
L#2 DoublesEmil Novak / Nina Mortazavi vs Jeffrey Stern / Gail Gibson4-6, 6-4, 0-1
W#3 DoublesHector Arroyo / Lilivette Arroyo vs Ross van Boven / Stephanie Wager6-4, 6-4
2026-03-01vs Florida/Orsini/40&Over9.0XDLost 03
L#1 DoublesGerardo Cuevas / Lilivette Arroyo vs Matthew Schnell / Rebecca Evangelista2-6, 7-6, 0-1
L#2 DoublesSean Henegan / Angie Jones vs Rogerio Bigio / Lya Kushnirovich2-6, 6-4, 0-1
L#3 DoublesChuck Davis / Natalie Paiva vs Pedro Franco Byrne / Stephanie Wager6-3, 2-6, 0-1
2026-02-22vs Florida/Orsini/40&Over9.0XDLost 03
L#1 DoublesChuck Davis / Natalie Paiva vs Gail Gibson / Jeffrey Stern1-6, 4-6
L#2 DoublesLilivette Arroyo / Sean Henegan vs Stephanie Means / Manuel Alvarez2-6, 0-6
L#3 DoublesKAREN HARKEY / Juan Segovia vs Stephanie Wager / Ross van Boven2-6, 6-7
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 9.0 Mixed 40 and Over have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 4.21 estimated across 16 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.80
Natalie Paiva
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
4.77
Emil Novak
usually #2 Doubles 33%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 5
4.65
Elizabeth Baldwin
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 5
4.37
Angie Jones
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 17% · published 4.5
4.37
KAREN HARKEY
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
4.35
Hector Arroyo
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 4.5
4.34
Lilivette Arroyo
usually #2 Doubles 33%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 4.5
4.31
Judi Alford
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4.5
4.22
Juan Segovia
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
4.13
Mike Moenter
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
4.03
Gerardo Cuevas
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4.5
3.94
Hiren Bhatt
usually #1 Doubles 80%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published 4
3.91
Nina Mortazavi
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 4
3.83
Christina Dausch
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.72
Richard Helme
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
3.61
Chuck Davis
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 4
Sean Henegan
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Christina Dausch + Hiren Bhatt213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Natalie Paiva
22W–20L career · 2 lines in 2026
1%93%6%
4.80
5
Emil Novak
3W–3L career · type S · 3 lines in 2026
2%94%4%
4.77
5
Elizabeth Baldwin
2W–8L career · 1 line in 2026
12%87%<1%
4.65
4.5
Angie Jones
11W–7L career · 6 lines in 2026
<1%84%15%
4.37
KAREN HARKEY
8W–3L career · 1 line in 2026
<1%85%15%
4.37
4.5
Hector Arroyo
5W–1L career · 1 line in 2026
<1%88%12%
4.35
4.5
Lilivette Arroyo
50W–36L career · 3 lines in 2026
<1%89%11%
4.34
4.5
Judi Alford
89W–31L career · 1 line in 2026
1%92%7%
4.31
Juan Segovia
1W–4L career · 1 line in 2026
4%94%2%
4.22
Mike Moenter
18W–9L career · 1 line in 2026
17%83%<1%
4.13
4.5
Gerardo Cuevas
30W–23L career · 1 line in 2026
41%59%<1%
4.03
4
Hiren Bhatt
152W–65L career · 5 lines in 2026
<1%67%32%
3.94
4
Nina Mortazavi
122W–62L career · 2 lines in 2026
<1%75%25%
3.91
4
Christina Dausch
180W–109L career · 1 line in 2026
1%90%10%
3.83
Richard Helme
2W–15L career · 6 lines in 2026
98%2%<1%
3.72
4
Chuck Davis
12W–10L career · 2 lines in 2026
19%80%<1%
3.61
Sean Henegan
1W–2L career · 2 lines in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.