Teams

IHCC-COHEN

2024 · 2025 MATA USTA Adult 40 & Over - Fall

9 players · average NTRP 4.25 / GEORGIA

View scouting list →
Schedule
Flight standings3 teams · 2025 MATA USTA Adult 40 & Over - Fall
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1IHCC-COHEN71201230263
2RN-EPPS44171533259
3HOCO-MURRAY17112145305

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.71 estimated across 7 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.15
Ellen Thomas
usually #2 Singles 21%, also #3 Doubles 21% · published 4.5
3.77
Beth Cohen
usually #1 Singles 73%, also #1 Doubles 13% · published 4
3.72
Kimberly Faulkner
usually #1 Doubles 46%, also #3 Doubles 36% · published
3.71
Jennifer Sweenor
usually #2 Doubles 46%, also #1 Doubles 31% · published
3.69
Meredith Covert
usually #1 Singles 29%, also #3 Doubles 29% · published
3.56
Michelle Lisenby
usually #2 Doubles 71%, also #1 Doubles 14% · published
3.38
Miriam Smith
usually #3 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 30% · published
Lisa West
published
Mindy Minei
usually #3 Doubles 33%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Meredith Covert + Miriam Smith5162% games+13.4% vs expected
Kimberly Faulkner + Jennifer Sweenor314 matchesnot enough data
Kimberly Faulkner + Miriam Smith404 matchesnot enough data
Ellen Thomas + Jennifer Sweenor303 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4.5
Ellen Thomas
49W–5L career · 12 lines in 2025
12%88%<1%
4.15
4
Beth Cohen
19W–17L career · 15 lines in 2025
2%94%4%
3.77
Kimberly Faulkner
19W–13L career · 11 lines in 2025
5%94%1%
3.72
Jennifer Sweenor
39W–26L career · 13 lines in 2025
5%93%1%
3.71
Meredith Covert
42W–19L career · 13 lines in 2025
8%91%1%
3.69
Michelle Lisenby
16W–13L career · 7 lines in 2025
<1%34%66%
3.56
Miriam Smith
22W–19L career · 10 lines in 2025
81%19%<1%
3.38
Lisa West
7W–4L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Mindy Minei
7W–8L career · 6 lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.