Teams

Walz

2023 One Doubles-Winter · 4.0 Men

4 players · average NTRP 3.75 / SOUTHWEST WASHINGTON

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2023-04-21vs Nichols/LieuwWon 10
W#1 DoublesJeff Walz / Brian Johnson vs Seok Nichols / Oliver Vicente6-1, 6-3
2023-04-08vs NWW-BarronLost 01
L#1 DoublesJeff Walz / Aaron Benson vs Blue Barron / Preston Dumas7-6, 6-7, 0-1
2023-03-14vs NWW-BarronLost 01
L#1 DoublesDavid Campana / Aaron Benson vs Blue Barron / Preston Dumas4-6, 6-2, 0-1
2023-03-08vs Nichols/LieuwWon 10
W#1 DoublesDavid Campana / Jeff Walz vs Ken Lieuw / Seok Nichols6-3, 6-4
2023-02-24vs Nichols/LieuwLost 01
L#1 DoublesJeff Walz / Brian Johnson vs Seok Nichols / Ken Lieuw2-6, 5-7
2023-02-16vs NWW-BarronWon 10
W#1 DoublesJeff Walz / David Campana vs Blue Barron / Preston Dumas6-2, 6-2
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 4.0 Men have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.56 estimated across 3 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.76
David Campana
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4
Jeff Walz
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.55
Aaron Benson
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.38
Brian Johnson
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Brian Johnson + David Campana2358% games+9.0% vs expected
Brian Johnson + Aaron Benson251457% games+6.8% vs expected
David Campana + Jeff Walz3450% games−0.9% vs expected
Brian Johnson + Jeff Walz4162% gamesnot enough data
David Campana + Aaron Benson213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
David Campana
132W–95L career · 3 lines in 2023
3%93%4%
3.76
4
Jeff Walz
110W–55L career · 5 lines in 2023
not enough data
3.5
Aaron Benson
99W–43L career · type A · 7 lines in 2023
<1%36%64%
3.55
3.5
Brian Johnson
169W–135L career · 7 lines in 2023
<1%80%20%
3.38

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.