Teams

TOC.Wilder

2026 CTRL Mixed 18 & Over · Mixed 18 & Over 10.0

13 players · average NTRP 4.79 / NORTH CAROLINA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2026-07-25vs TOC.RemleySplit 11
L#1 DoublesKwame Owens / Ivette Duran vs Andrew Perdue / Tanita Tedamrongwanish6-4, 2-6, 0-1
W#2 DoublesJason Hull / Danielle Wilder vs Parv Mital / Jamie Breunig6-4, 2-6, 1-0
2026-07-15vs TOC.RemleyLost 12
L#1 DoublesEvan Wharton / Ivette Duran vs Matthew Nicholson / Lisa Spees2-6, 6-3, 0-1
L#2 DoublesJason Hull / Paula Collado Cordon vs Andrew Dinicola / Tanita Tedamrongwanish6-4, 1-6, 0-1
W#3 DoublesJulien de la Mettrie / Emily Tinervin vs Parv Mital / Lauren Laughton7-5, 6-4
2026-06-27vs TOC.RemleyLost 03
L#1 DoublesKwame Owens / Danielle Wilder vs Joshua Franceschina / Heather Remley6-3, 3-6, 0-1
L#2 DoublesEvan Wharton / Laura Alvarez vs Andrew Dinicola / Tanita Tedamrongwanish3-6, 6-3, 0-1
L#3 DoublesWes Watson / Ivette Duran vs Parv Mital / Jamie Breunig2-6, 3-6
2026-06-24vs TOC.RemleyWon 21
W#1 DoublesJulien de la Mettrie / Emily Tinervin vs Matthew Nicholson / Lisa Spees6-1, 6-3
W#2 DoublesEvan Wharton / Laura Alvarez vs Tejas Chandrasekhar / Jennifer McEntee5-7, 6-1, 1-0
L#3 DoublesWes Watson / Danielle Wilder vs Andrew Perdue / Heidi Steiber1-6, 3-6
2026-06-06vs TOC.RemleyWon 21
W#1 DoublesJulien de la Mettrie / Julia Howard vs Joshua Franceschina / Lauren Laughton7-5, 6-1
W#2 DoublesKwame Owens / Ivette Duran vs Andrew Dinicola / Heidi Steiber6-4, 2-6, 1-0
L#3 DoublesDrew Sandri / Erin Piechocinski vs Matthew Nicholson / Lisa Spees1-6, 1-6
2026-05-30vs TOC.RemleyLost 03
L#1 DoublesJulia Howard / Wes Watson vs Jamie Breunig / Andrew Dinicola1-6, 4-6
L#2 DoublesErin Piechocinski / Drew Sandri vs Parv Mital / Lauren Laughton3-6, 2-6
L#3 DoublesDanielle Wilder / Kwame Owens vs Andrew Perdue / Jennifer McEntee5-7, 5-7
2026-05-20vs TOC.RemleyLost 12
L#1 DoublesWes Watson / Laura Alvarez vs Todd Smith / Heidi Steiber3-6, 3-6
L#2 DoublesJulien de la Mettrie / Emily Tinervin vs Andrew Perdue / Jennifer McEntee2-6, 6-7
W#3 DoublesKwame Owens / Paula Collado Cordon vs Tejas Chandrasekhar / Heather Remley6-4, 7-5
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings2 teams · Mixed 18 & Over 10.0
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1TOC.Remley4313821179
2TOC.Wilder3481329207

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 4.47 estimated across 12 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.86
Julien de la Mettrie
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 5
4.81
Laura Alvarez
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
4.55
Evan Wharton
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
4.52
Kwame Owens
usually #3 Doubles 40%, also #1 Doubles 40% · published 5
4.51
Ivette Duran
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published
4.50
Danielle Wilder
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published 5
4.43
Paula Collado Cordon
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 5
4.42
Jason Hull
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
4.33
Emily Tinervin
usually #3 Doubles 57%, also #2 Doubles 29% · published 4.5
4.32
Julia Howard
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
4.28
Wes Watson
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 4.5
4.16
Erin Piechocinski
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 4.5
Drew Sandri
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Emily Tinervin + Julien de la Mettrie12360% games+3.2% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

5
Julien de la Mettrie
77W–20L career · 4 lines in 2026
no projection at this level
4.86
Laura Alvarez
11W–8L career · 3 lines in 2026
no projection at this level
4.81
Evan Wharton
22W–4L career · 3 lines in 2026
<1%37%63%
4.55
5
Kwame Owens
168W–56L career · 5 lines in 2026
no projection at this level
4.52
Ivette Duran
5W–7L career · 4 lines in 2026
no projection at this level
4.51
5
Danielle Wilder
229W–112L career · 4 lines in 2026
no projection at this level
4.50
5
Paula Collado Cordon
64W–56L career · 2 lines in 2026
no projection at this level
4.43
Jason Hull
6W–9L career · 2 lines in 2026
no projection at this level
4.42
4.5
Emily Tinervin
175W–72L career · 7 lines in 2026
1%88%11%
4.33
Julia Howard
3W–6L career · 2 lines in 2026
no projection at this level
4.32
4.5
Wes Watson
154W–128L career · 4 lines in 2026
2%92%6%
4.28
4.5
Erin Piechocinski
66W–75L career · 4 lines in 2026
13%86%1%
4.16
Drew Sandri
0W–3L career · 2 lines in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.