Teams

McMullen Ebony & Ivory

2024 Pinellas Combo 50 & Over Fall · 6.5 W Saturday

6 players · average NTRP 3.38 / REGION_3

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2024-11-16vs Countryside MisfitsWon 10
W#1 DoublesJoan Whitten / Tricia Lolkus vs Dina Glover / Tammy Miller6-7, 6-4, 1-0
2024-11-09vs Ardea ShotchasersLost 01
L#1 DoublesTricia Lolkus / Martha Chapman vs Debra Burwell / Gail Stallwood3-6, 6-7
2024-11-02vs Treasure Bay Island ServivorsLost 02
L#1 DoublesJoan Whitten / Haydeh Bagheri vs Sally Blush / Debra Edwards1-6, 6-7
L#3 DoublesNivea Urdaneta / Martha Chapman vs Shelley Williams / Elizabeth Jordan1-6, 5-7
2024-10-26vs SPTC Holliday 6.5 WLost 02
L#2 DoublesEsthela Gonzalez / Kimberly Kurey vs Brooke Rosenberg / Danielle Coke4-6, 2-6
L#3 DoublesJoan Whitten / Haydeh Bagheri vs Eileen Beck / Christine Assefa4-6, 7-5, 0-1
2024-10-19vs McMullen PronatorsWon 20
W#2 DoublesEsthela Gonzalez / Karen Miller vs Gladys Nunamaker / Maria C Cadena-Krone6-2, 6-1
W#3 DoublesJoan Whitten / Haydeh Bagheri vs Mary Garrido / Maria Calderon6-2, 7-6
2024-10-05vs SPTC FireballsWon 10
W#1 DoublesJoan Whitten / Tricia Lolkus vs Cindy Kobeda / Melissa Wirt7-6, 6-1
2024-09-21vs Pinellas/Weinstock/50&Over6.5WLost 12
L#1 DoublesEsthela Gonzalez / Karen Miller vs Sherrie Bourgeois / Stella Maganiaris7-6, 6-7, 0-1
L#2 DoublesJoan Whitten / Martha Chapman vs Joan Johnson / Susan Weissler1-6, 7-5, 0-1
W#3 DoublesKim Williams / Tricia Lolkus vs Gail Eberhardt / Patricia Smith6-2, 6-2
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 6.5 W Saturday have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.13 estimated across 5 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.50
Tricia Lolkus
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
3.46
Joan Whitten
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.21
Esthela Gonzalez
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
2.77
Martha Chapman
published
2.73
Kimberly Kurey
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3
Nivea Urdaneta
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Joan Whitten + Tricia Lolkus22657% games+8.1% vs expected
Esthela Gonzalez + Tricia Lolkus4155% gamesnot enough data
Esthela Gonzalez + Joan Whitten033 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Tricia Lolkus
98W–60L career · 4 lines in 2024
<1%48%52%
3.50
3.5
Joan Whitten
183W–137L career · 6 lines in 2024
<1%63%37%
3.46
3.5
Esthela Gonzalez
127W–148L career · 3 lines in 2024
6%93%1%
3.21
Martha Chapman
19W–4L career · no lines in 2024
2%94%4%
2.77
3
Kimberly Kurey
21W–28L career · 1 line in 2024
4%94%2%
2.73
Nivea Urdaneta
26W–35L career · 1 line in 2024
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.