Teams

Selma - Utsey

2024 Selma Southern Combo Doubles 18's · Women's 6.5

9 players · average NTRP / ALABAMA

View scouting list →
Schedule4 played
2024-10-08vs Selma ChappelleLost 12
L#1 DoublesKeisha Wilson / Mallory Kelley vs Rebecca Stewart / Landon Posey5-7, 3-6
W#2 DoublesSid Utsey / Jennifer Dobbs vs Rachel Todd / Melinda Fuller6-2, 6-1
L#3 DoublesKatie Barrette / Kennedy Bergeron vs Claire Mosley / Amy Jones4-6, 0-6
2024-10-07vs Selma ChappelleSplit 11
L#1 DoublesKatie Barrette / Jennifer Dobbs vs Leigh Chappelle / Jessica Spivey2-6, 3-6
W#2 DoublesSid Utsey / Rayne Osborn vs Kim Simpkins / Melinda Fuller6-1, 6-4
2024-10-06vs Selma ChappelleLost 03
L#1 DoublesSid Utsey / Nikki Gilmore vs Leigh Chappelle / Amy Jones4-6, 6-7
L#2 DoublesKatie Barrette / Jennifer Dobbs vs Rebecca Stewart / Alicia Beers3-6, 4-6
L#3 DoublesRayne Osborn / Fran Spivey vs Rachel Todd / Jennifer Roberts6-3, 1-6, 0-1
2024-09-28vs Selma ChappelleLost 12
L#1 DoublesSid Utsey / Fran Spivey vs Leigh Chappelle / Jessica Spivey6-4, 3-6, 1-0
L#2 DoublesKeisha Wilson / Nikki Gilmore vs Kim Simpkins / Amy Jones5-7, 3-6
W#3 DoublesKatie Barrette / Rayne Osborn vs Rachel Todd / Melinda Fuller6-2, 6-3
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Women's 6.5 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.19 estimated across 5 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.44
Sid Utsey
usually #2 Doubles 71%, also #1 Doubles 29% · published
3.28
Jennifer Dobbs
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
3.21
Keisha Wilson
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published
3.18
Katie Barrette
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 17% · published
2.84
Kennedy Bergeron
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
Fran Spivey
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
Mallory Kelley
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Nikki Gilmore
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
Rayne Osborn
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Katie Barrette + Sid Utsey044 matchesnot enough data
Keisha Wilson + Sid Utsey303 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Sid Utsey
27W–20L career · 7 lines in 2024
<1%67%33%
3.44
Jennifer Dobbs
31W–8L career · 4 lines in 2024
2%92%5%
3.28
Keisha Wilson
18W–10L career · 4 lines in 2024
7%91%2%
3.21
Katie Barrette
6W–14L career · 6 lines in 2024
10%89%1%
3.18
Kennedy Bergeron
17W–5L career · 2 lines in 2024
1%86%13%
2.84
Fran Spivey
2W–3L career · 2 lines in 2024
not enough data
Mallory Kelley
1W–8L career · 1 line in 2024
not enough data
Nikki Gilmore
2W–5L career · 2 lines in 2024
not enough data
Rayne Osborn
5W–2L career · 3 lines in 2024
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.