Teams

Bradshaw/LR/LRAC

2026 Mixed 55 & Over · 9.0 Mixed

9 players · average NTRP 4.50 / ARKANSAS

View scouting list →
Schedule4 played
2026-07-28vs ATA TeamWon 30
W#1 DoublesKathryn Peacock / Bynum Matthews vs Leslie King-Gillispie / Alvin Rogers8-4
W#2 DoublesKirk Bradshaw / Karen Koen vs Jay Heflin / Sara Gardner8-4
W#3 DoublesWyatt Miller / Mary Rhoades vs Dennis Gilliam / Cendey Roberts8-6
2026-07-26vs ATA TeamWon 30
W#1 DoublesBynum Matthews / Kathryn Peacock vs Alvin Rogers / Leslie King-Gillispie8-6
W#2 DoublesWyatt Miller / Mary Rhoades vs Dennis Gilliam / Cendey Roberts8-6
W#3 DoublesKaren Koen / Kirk Bradshaw vs Sara Gardner / Jay Heflin8-6
2026-07-20vs ATA TeamWon 30
W#1 DoublesWendy Mikula / Eric Sixbey vs Cendey Roberts / Dennis Gilliam8-5
W#2 DoublesGary Jones / Dottie Highfill vs Dave Bobbitt / Devona Shelton8-2
W#3 DoublesKirk Bradshaw / Karen Koen vs Jay Heflin / Sara Gardner8-6
2026-07-19vs ATA TeamWon 30
W#1 DoublesKirk Bradshaw / Karen Koen vs Jay Heflin / Sara Gardner8-4
W#2 DoublesWendy Mikula / Eric Sixbey vs Dennis Gilliam / Cendey Roberts8-4
W#3 DoublesGary Jones / Dottie Highfill vs Devona Shelton / Dave Bobbitt8-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings1 teams · 9.0 Mixed
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1Bradshaw/LR/LRAC40120054

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 4.21 estimated across 9 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.50
Wyatt Miller
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
4.34
Eric Sixbey
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
4.34
Bynum Matthews
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4.5
4.27
Dottie Highfill
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
4.22
Mary Rhoades
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
4.21
Kirk Bradshaw
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published
4.12
Karen Koen
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published
4.09
Wendy Mikula
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
3.84
Kathryn Peacock
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Karen Koen + Kirk Bradshaw404 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Wyatt Miller
8W–0L career · 2 lines in 2026
<1%51%49%
4.50
Eric Sixbey
5W–1L career · 2 lines in 2026
1%87%13%
4.34
4.5
Bynum Matthews
11W–1L career · 2 lines in 2026
1%87%12%
4.34
Dottie Highfill
5W–3L career · 2 lines in 2026
3%92%5%
4.27
Mary Rhoades
9W–2L career · 2 lines in 2026
5%92%2%
4.22
Kirk Bradshaw
11W–2L career · 4 lines in 2026
7%91%2%
4.21
Karen Koen
16W–5L career · 4 lines in 2026
20%80%<1%
4.12
Wendy Mikula
6W–4L career · 2 lines in 2026
26%74%<1%
4.09
Kathryn Peacock
4W–3L career · 2 lines in 2026
87%13%<1%
3.84

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.