Teams

SDNC 4.5 KCP (2:2)/ Buggs

2024 Adult 40 & Over Winter- SDNC WE · SDNC

10 players · average NTRP 4.50 / SAN DIEGO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2024-03-17vs SDNC 4.5 RPTC (2:2)/ IsiharaWon 20
W#2 DoublesBernie Buggs / John Broderick vs Dieter Steinmetz / Mark Ishihara6-2, 6-3
W#3 DoublesDavid Jaehnig / T Solomon Liu vs Samuel Conway / Shimul Chowdhury6-2, 6-4
2024-03-03vs SDNC 4.5 FRCC (3:1)/ MazarelliSplit 11
L#1 DoublesDavid Jaehnig / James MacDonald vs Russell Silberstein / Bruce Ives4-6, 6-7
W#2 DoublesBernie Buggs / John Broderick vs Steffan Dye / Sebastian Salomon5-7, 5-4
2024-02-25Won 10
W#1 DoublesBernie Buggs / Jeffrey Ford vs Nathan Nguyen / Tony Tran6-4, 6-3
W#1 DoublesDavid Jaehnig / Jeffrey Ford vs Alex Barnett / Kevin Pegels6-2, 4-6, 1-0
W#2 DoublesBernie Buggs / John Broderick vs Rick Jensen / Matthew Comyns7-5, 6-2
L#2 DoublesBernie Buggs / Jeffrey Ford vs Ranjit Salvi / Sirius Yoo5-7, 6-7
L#3 DoublesJohn Broderick / David Jaehnig vs Andrew Ma / Jason Char4-6, 6-7
L#1 DoublesBernie Buggs / Jeffrey Ford vs Michael Hotti / Jose Ruelas3-6, 2-6
2024-01-14Won 10
W#2 DoublesBernie Buggs / John Broderick vs Alexander Magtanong / Maximo Salonga6-4, 4-6, 1-0
2024-01-07vs SD 4.5 Balboa (3:1)/ HwangSplit 11
L#2 DoublesDavid Jaehnig / Chad Basinger vs Jason Hom / Andrew MacFarlane3-6, 3-6
W#3 DoublesBernie Buggs / John Graber vs Will Garber / Joseph Barraquio6-2, 7-5
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for SDNC have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 4.25 estimated across 4 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.42
ALEXANDRE COLAS
published 4.5
4.39
Bernie Buggs
usually #2 Doubles 63%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published 4.5
Craig Bramlett
published 4.5
4.19
Chad Basinger
published 4.5
4.02
David Jaehnig
usually #3 Doubles 40%, also #1 Doubles 40% · published 4.5
James MacDonald
published
Jeffrey Ford
published
John Broderick
published
John Graber
published
T Solomon Liu
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Chad Basinger + John Graber123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4.5
ALEXANDRE COLAS
15W–2L career · type A · no lines in 2024
<1%71%29%
4.42
4.5
Bernie Buggs
155W–51L career · 8 lines in 2024
<1%78%21%
4.39
4.5
Craig Bramlett
2W–0L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
4.5
Chad Basinger
4W–4L career · no lines in 2024
9%90%1%
4.19
4.5
David Jaehnig
56W–42L career · 5 lines in 2024
45%55%<1%
4.02
James MacDonald
4W–1L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
Jeffrey Ford
8W–6L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
John Broderick
2W–1L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
John Graber
3W–5L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
T Solomon Liu
1W–1L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.