Teams

JMorse (JCC)

2023 Combo Doubles 18 & Over League · 18 & Over 6.5 Men - Mon PM

9 players · average NTRP 3.75 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2023-10-09vs GEstrada (Queens)Split 11
L#1 DoublesJeffrey Kuykendal / RONALD TOWNSEND vs Luis Dieguez / Gerardo Estrada2-6, 6-7
W#3 DoublesYuefeng Han / Jeff Morse vs N/A6-0, 6-0
2023-10-02vs TFarley (Park Crossing)Won 10
W#1 DoublesJeff Morse / Jeffrey Kuykendal vs Chip Cooke / Wynn Walker6-0, 6-4
2023-09-18vs THull (Life Time)Won 10
W#2 DoublesJeff Morse / Jeffrey Kuykendal vs Damian Hamp-Adams / Brandon Pruski6-2, 7-6
2023-09-11vs JDichak (WSRC)Split 11
W#1 DoublesJeff Morse / Jeffrey Kuykendal vs Ron Dock / Billy Stover6-2, 5-7, 1-0
L#2 DoublesRONALD TOWNSEND / Yuefeng Han vs Kevin Stein / Mike Gentile2-6, 1-6
2023-09-06vs HPence (PLCC)Won 10
W#1 DoublesJeff Morse / Jeffrey Kuykendal vs Brett Basden / Marc Swann3-6, 6-0, 1-0
2023-09-04vs GEstrada (Queens)Won 10
W#2 DoublesJeff Morse / Jeffrey Kuykendal vs Tobi Abel / Ivan Blakeney6-3, 7-5
2023-08-21vs MWallace (Queens)Won 20
W#1 DoublesJeffrey Kuykendal / Rob Owen vs Taylor Brown / Steven Johnson6-3, 7-5
W#2 DoublesYuefeng Han / RONALD TOWNSEND vs Ken DeHart / Zack Johnson5-7, 6-2, 1-0
2023-08-14vs TFarley (Park Crossing)Lost 01
L#2 DoublesJeffrey Kuykendal / Jeff Morse vs Brooke Beacham / Robert Sledd2-6, 6-3, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 18 & Over 6.5 Men - Mon PM have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.15 estimated across 9 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.68
Jeffrey Kuykendal
usually #1 Doubles 63%, also #2 Doubles 38% · published 4
3.40
Yuefeng Han
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.27
James Londeree
published
3.23
RONALD TOWNSEND
published
3.17
Rob Owen
published
3.08
Greg Hobby
published
3.05
John Haviland
published
2.80
Richard Williamson
published
2.69
Jeff Morse
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

RONALD TOWNSEND + Rob Owen404 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Jeffrey Kuykendal
33W–23L career · 8 lines in 2023
10%89%1%
3.68
3.5
Yuefeng Han
76W–69L career · 3 lines in 2023
<1%76%24%
3.40
James Londeree
2W–4L career · no lines in 2023
3%92%5%
3.27
RONALD TOWNSEND
12W–11L career · no lines in 2023
5%92%2%
3.23
Rob Owen
8W–6L career · no lines in 2023
<1%12%88%
3.17
Greg Hobby
5W–7L career · no lines in 2023
<1%29%71%
3.08
John Haviland
1W–4L career · no lines in 2023
<1%35%65%
3.05
Richard Williamson
5W–11L career · no lines in 2023
2%91%8%
2.80
Jeff Morse
7W–16L career · no lines in 2023
9%90%1%
2.69

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.