Teams

JPermutt-CHTC

2026 Eno River Singles 55 & Over · 55 & Over Singles 3.5 Women Day

9 players · average NTRP 3.40 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2026-06-18vs MLong-DURSplit 11
W#1 SinglesAndy Blackburn vs Richelle Robinson6-0, 6-1
L#2 SinglesJoelle Permutt vs Nancy Draughon3-6, 6-4, 1-0
2026-06-06vs CPeterson-HVCCLost 12
L#1 SinglesYvonne Acker vs Jennifer Pyle3-6, 2-6
L#2 SinglesDina Golden vs Barbara Wilhelm0-6, 0-6
W#3 SinglesRegina Davis vs Cecily Peterson2-6, 6-4, 1-0
2026-06-05vs MLong-DURWon 21
W#1 SinglesJoelle Permutt vs Richelle Robinson6-2, 6-1
L#2 SinglesDina Golden vs Susana Harvey0-6, 0-6
W#3 SinglesCynthia Kleeberger vs Mary T Long6-0, 6-2
2026-05-24vs MLong-DURLost 12
L#1 SinglesJoelle Permutt vs Deb Lanier1-6, 2-6
W#2 SinglesCelina Morice vs Mary T Long6-1, 6-0
L#3 SinglesMary Griffiths vs Susana Harvey2-6, 0-6
2026-05-21vs CPeterson-HVCCLost 12
W#1 SinglesYvonne Acker vs Diane Allen6-3, 2-6, 1-0
L#2 SinglesCynthia Kleeberger vs Barbara Wilhelm1-6, 0-6
L#3 SinglesRegina Davis vs Deborah Hertzog1-6, 1-6
2026-05-15vs CPeterson-HVCCLost 12
W#1 SinglesAndy Blackburn vs Cecily Peterson6-2, 7-5
L#2 SinglesDina Golden vs Joanie Preyer2-6, 6-3, 1-0
L#3 SinglesMary Griffiths vs Deborah Hertzog6-4, 0-6, 0-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings2 teams · 55 & Over Singles 3.5 Women Day
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1CPeterson-HVCC511261498
2JPermutt-CHTC1571124159

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.19 estimated across 9 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.44
Andy Blackburn
usually #1 Singles 100% · published 3.5
3.39
Celina Morice
usually #2 Singles 100% · published 3.5
3.35
Joelle Permutt
usually #1 Singles 67%, also #2 Singles 33% · published
3.18
Lynne Farber
published
3.17
Regina Davis
usually #3 Singles 100% · published
3.13
Dina Golden
usually #2 Singles 100% · published 3.5
3.11
Yvonne Acker
usually #1 Singles 100% · published 3.5
3.05
Mary Griffiths
usually #3 Singles 100% · published
2.89
Cynthia Kleeberger
usually #2 Singles 50%, also #3 Singles 50% · published 3
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Celina Morice + Yvonne Acker123 matchesnot enough data
Dina Golden + Joelle Permutt213 matchesnot enough data
Dina Golden + Andy Blackburn213 matchesnot enough data
Mary Griffiths + Yvonne Acker213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Andy Blackburn
114W–90L career · 2 lines in 2026
<1%66%34%
3.44
3.5
Celina Morice
92W–77L career · 1 line in 2026
<1%77%22%
3.39
Joelle Permutt
19W–13L career · 3 lines in 2026
1%85%15%
3.35
Lynne Farber
6W–5L career · no lines in 2026
10%89%1%
3.18
Regina Davis
27W–45L career · 2 lines in 2026
12%87%1%
3.17
3.5
Dina Golden
102W–68L career · 3 lines in 2026
18%82%<1%
3.13
3.5
Yvonne Acker
125W–166L career · 2 lines in 2026
22%78%<1%
3.11
Mary Griffiths
29W–19L career · 2 lines in 2026
<1%36%64%
3.05
3
Cynthia Kleeberger
57W–47L career · 2 lines in 2026
<1%79%21%
2.89

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.