Teams

GEPTA-3.5-Adult/WAbbud)(CCC)

SouthernNewMexico · 2024 USA ADULT 40 & OVER LEAGUE

18 players · average NTRP 3.38 / GEPTA

View scouting list →

Flight standings for 2024 USA ADULT 40 & OVER LEAGUE have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.92 estimated across 3 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

Adriana Zaragoza
published 3.5
3.13
Claudia Abbud
usually #3 Doubles 48%, also #2 Doubles 30% · published 3.5
2.91
Carmen-Gloria Yamal
usually #2 Doubles 47%, also #3 Doubles 47% · published 3.5
2.72
Ana Baca
usually #2 Doubles 39%, also #3 Doubles 35% · published 3
Elva Malooly
usually #2 Doubles 57%, also #3 Doubles 29% · published
Fadia Ghaleb
usually #1 Doubles 86%, also #3 Doubles 14% · published
Felisa Fuentes
usually #1 Doubles 55%, also #2 Doubles 36% · published
Georgina Munoz
usually #3 Doubles 56%, also #1 Singles 25% · published
Kristine Garcia
published
Lia Davalos
usually #2 Singles 25%, also #1 Singles 25% · published
Marcia Zaragoza
usually #1 Doubles 36%, also #3 Doubles 27% · published
Maria Baeza
usually #2 Doubles 33%, also #1 Doubles 29% · published
Maya I Quevedo
usually #1 Singles 57%, also #2 Singles 36% · published
Melissa Isaac
usually #3 Doubles 45%, also #1 Doubles 28% · published
Monica Gonzalez
usually #2 Doubles 29%, also #3 Doubles 24% · published
Sandra Alost
published
Sarvelia Diaz
usually #2 Doubles 58%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
Vanessa Herrera
usually #3 Doubles 46%, also #1 Doubles 27% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Marcia Zaragoza + Adriana Zaragoza8556% games+4.5% vs expected
Adriana Zaragoza + Melissa Isaac151651% games+2.5% vs expected
Claudia Abbud + Georgina Munoz41539% games+0.5% vs expected
Claudia Abbud + Carmen-Gloria Yamal5451% games−3.7% vs expected
Marcia Zaragoza + Sarvelia Diaz4545% games−6.2% vs expected
Maria Baeza + Felisa Fuentes12355% gamesnot enough data
Elva Malooly + Sarvelia Diaz6848% gamesnot enough data
Monica Gonzalez + Ana Baca7556% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Adriana Zaragoza
44W–47L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
3.5
Claudia Abbud
55W–104L career · 23 lines in 2024
17%82%<1%
3.13
3.5
Carmen-Gloria Yamal
47W–62L career · 15 lines in 2024
74%26%<1%
2.91
3
Ana Baca
43W–42L career · 23 lines in 2024
5%92%2%
2.72
Elva Malooly
23W–53L career · 7 lines in 2024
not enough data
Fadia Ghaleb
13W–31L career · 7 lines in 2024
not enough data
Felisa Fuentes
57W–22L career · 22 lines in 2024
not enough data
Georgina Munoz
35W–78L career · 15 lines in 2024
not enough data
Kristine Garcia
23W–25L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
Lia Davalos
24W–52L career · 7 lines in 2024
not enough data
Marcia Zaragoza
36W–64L career · 10 lines in 2024
not enough data
Maria Baeza
58W–35L career · 22 lines in 2024
not enough data
Maya I Quevedo
29W–36L career · 14 lines in 2024
not enough data
Melissa Isaac
107W–104L career · 29 lines in 2024
not enough data
Monica Gonzalez
55W–41L career · 18 lines in 2024
not enough data
Sandra Alost
30W–59L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
Sarvelia Diaz
49W–87L career · 12 lines in 2024
not enough data
Vanessa Herrera
47W–66L career · 11 lines in 2024
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.