Teams

MPTC - I'd Hit That

**2025 Team Combo · Ladies 8.5

13 players · average NTRP 4.50 / TEXAS

View scouting list →
Schedule5 played
L#1 DoublesJillian Ermis / Joyce Tiong vs Jennifer Gruber / Erika Gruber3-6, 6-4, 1-0
L#2 DoublesLiana Gonzalez / Sara Wilks vs Rebecca Nguyen / Kelsey McNeil2-6, 4-6
W#3 DoublesKaren Jensen / Chelsea Grear vs Maria Gabriela Graterol Stefanelli / Claudia Leung7-5, 7-6
L#1 DoublesCecilia Tetlow / Jillian Ermis vs Jennifer Gruber / Erika Gruber6-7, 1-6
W#2 DoublesMae Baird / Katharina Beyer vs KimAshley Gruber / Claudia Leung6-2, 6-1
L#3 DoublesTracy Martin / Sachiko Jungbluth vs Erika Gruber / Jennifer Gruber3-6, 1-6
W#1 DoublesRachel Howie / Karen Jensen vs Shelby Fillingame / Kinsey Wedden6-2, 6-2
W#1 DoublesMae Baird / Stephanie Dudzinski vs Erika Gruber / Jennifer Gruber6-3, 7-5
W#2 DoublesChelsea Grear / Jillian Ermis vs Rebecca Nguyen / Kinsey Wedden6-0, 6-3
W#3 DoublesLiana Gonzalez / Lynette Mendoza vs Claudia Leung / KimAshley Gruber7-5, 6-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Ladies 8.5 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.93 estimated across 12 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.34
Rachel Howie
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
4.28
Sachiko Jungbluth
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 4.5
4.05
Cecilia Tetlow
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4.5
4.04
Chelsea Grear
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 4.5
4.03
Katharina Beyer
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
4.01
Joyce Tiong
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.99
Stephanie Dudzinski
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.90
Sara Wilks
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.80
Jillian Ermis
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
3.69
Liana Gonzalez
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
3.64
Mae Baird
usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published
3.36
Lynette Mendoza
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Tracy Martin
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Chelsea Grear + Mae Baird6258% games+2.4% vs expected
Rachel Howie + Stephanie Dudzinski303 matchesnot enough data
Liana Gonzalez + Cecilia Tetlow303 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Rachel Howie
59W–17L career · 3 lines in 2025
<1%1%99%
4.34
4.5
Sachiko Jungbluth
81W–59L career · 1 line in 2025
2%92%6%
4.28
4.5
Cecilia Tetlow
28W–29L career · 2 lines in 2025
35%65%<1%
4.05
4.5
Chelsea Grear
39W–27L career · 2 lines in 2025
38%62%<1%
4.04
Katharina Beyer
33W–7L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%<1%>99%
4.03
Joyce Tiong
11W–10L career · 2 lines in 2025
48%52%<1%
4.01
Stephanie Dudzinski
58W–23L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%<1%>99%
3.99
Sara Wilks
38W–17L career · 1 line in 2025
76%24%<1%
3.90
Jillian Ermis
53W–19L career · 3 lines in 2025
<1%2%98%
3.80
Liana Gonzalez
37W–15L career · 2 lines in 2025
<1%8%92%
3.69
Mae Baird
41W–8L career · 5 lines in 2025
16%84%1%
3.64
Lynette Mendoza
53W–47L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%83%16%
3.36
Tracy Martin
22W–19L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.