Teams

Ka.King18C

2023 Cap Combo 18 & Over · 5.5 Women

14 players · average NTRP 3.21 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule16 played
2023-10-02Won 10
W#3 DoublesMelanie Leach / Kristen Duke vs Kristin Wehmeyer / Blair Burr6-1, 7-5
2023-10-01vs Bl.Leippe18C5.5Won 10
W#3 DoublesKaren Johnston / Lanier McRee vs Carol Fielitz / Mindy Hamlin6-2, 6-1
2023-09-30vs Ch.Waychoff18CWon 10
W#2 DoublesKaren Johnston / Tracy Lowrance vs April Bazin / Katie Warren6-1, 6-1
2023-09-26vs Br.Robinson18C5.5Won 20
W#1 DoublesKaren Johnston / Tracy Lowrance vs Rebecca Glendy / Alexa Spain6-1, 7-5
W#3 DoublesJoanne Kearney / Kristen Duke vs Jenny Sweet / Paige Boyles6-1, 6-4
2023-09-25vs Ba.Wilhelm18CWon 10
W#1 DoublesKeshia Green / Kristen Duke vs Rossana Prevost / Heath Hilliker6-2, 6-1
2023-09-24vs Je.Sagal Solomon18CWon 21
W#1 DoublesJennifer Brock / Tracy Lowrance vs Bearta Alchacar / Christy van Ness6-2, 6-0
W#2 DoublesHeather DeAngelis / Joanne Kearney vs Dana Earle / Corinne Alavi6-2, 3-6, 1-0
L#3 DoublesKeeley McCormick / Lanier McRee vs Michele Nowicki / Crystal Beard7-6, 4-6, 1-0
2023-09-18vs Kr.Gilreath18CWon 10
W#1 DoublesKristen Duke / Alison Sinclair vs Mary Lewis James / Ann Flores6-1, 6-0
2023-09-11Won 10
W#2 DoublesKeshia Green / Kristen Duke vs Elizabeth Vieira / Taylor Anderton6-0, 6-1
2023-08-28vs Ai.Mikula18CWon 10
W#2 DoublesMelanie Leach / Kristen Duke vs Kelly Blevins / Casey Novak6-2, 4-6, 1-0
2023-08-28vs Je.Anderson18C5.5Split 11
W#2 DoublesNaomi Rodrigues / Tracy Lowrance vs Karen Hepp / Ashley Noble4-6, 6-2, 1-0
L#3 DoublesHeather DeAngelis / Karen Johnston vs Jennifer Anderson / Beth Gildea0-6, 5-7
2023-08-27vs Am.Cuni18CWon 20
W#2 DoublesMegan Burke / Kristen Duke vs Jody Mahoney / Megan Lynch6-0, 6-3
W#3 DoublesLanier McRee / Keeley McCormick vs Heidi McCann / Kay Bonavita3-6, 6-4, 1-0
2023-08-21vs Ju.Andrews18CLost 01
L#2 DoublesKristen Duke / Melanie Leach vs Ferebee Plyler / Sarah Newton4-6, 6-1, 0-1
2023-08-17vs Ch.Waychoff18CLost 01
L#2 DoublesMelanie Leach / Kristen Duke vs Katie Warren / Stephanie Bradley0-6, 5-7
2023-08-16Won 10
W#3 DoublesKeeley McCormick / Lusally Hong vs Caroline Smith / Laura Roach6-1, 7-5
2023-08-14vs Ai.Mikula18CWon 10
W#3 DoublesKristen Duke / Rachel Sanders vs Catherine Wilborne / Lisa Bourget6-3, 6-2
2023-08-06Won 10
W#2 DoublesJoanne Kearney / Heather DeAngelis vs Rebecca Anderson / Christine Johnson6-2, 1-6, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 5.5 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.08 estimated across 14 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.71
Jennifer Kuzma
published
3.70
Liz Chen
published
3.53
Naomi Rodrigues
published
3.33
Karen Johnston
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
3.31
Katherine King
published
3.27
Joanne Kearney
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
3.22
Jennifer Brock
published
3.19
Tracy Lowrance
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
2.93
Keeley McCormick
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.85
Lanier McRee
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.65
Catherine Chan
published 3
2.63
Heather DeAngelis
published
2.56
Kristen Duke
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 30% · published 3
2.30
Lusally Hong
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Joanne Kearney + Karen Johnston5552% games+7.8% vs expected
Tracy Lowrance + Karen Johnston371061% games+3.5% vs expected
Kristen Duke + Lanier McRee12756% games+2.9% vs expected
Jennifer Brock + Karen Johnston3246% games−7.8% vs expected
Kristen Duke + Karen Johnston4161% gamesnot enough data
Lanier McRee + Keeley McCormick4160% gamesnot enough data
Joanne Kearney + Jennifer Kuzma134 matchesnot enough data
Kristen Duke + Joanne Kearney213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Jennifer Kuzma
51W–68L career · no lines in 2023
6%92%2%
3.71
Liz Chen
22W–8L career · no lines in 2023
7%91%2%
3.70
Naomi Rodrigues
35W–13L career · no lines in 2023
<1%42%58%
3.53
3.5
Karen Johnston
259W–106L career · 8 lines in 2023
1%87%12%
3.33
Katherine King
15W–9L career · no lines in 2023
1%90%9%
3.31
3.5
Joanne Kearney
269W–160L career · 8 lines in 2023
3%92%5%
3.27
Jennifer Brock
18W–14L career · no lines in 2023
6%92%2%
3.22
3.5
Tracy Lowrance
185W–109L career · 4 lines in 2023
8%90%1%
3.19
3
Keeley McCormick
47W–39L career · 3 lines in 2023
<1%68%32%
2.93
3
Lanier McRee
118W–98L career · 3 lines in 2023
1%86%14%
2.85
3
Catherine Chan
6W–11L career · no lines in 2023
15%85%1%
2.65
Heather DeAngelis
2W–5L career · no lines in 2023
19%81%<1%
2.63
3
Kristen Duke
115W–104L career · 10 lines in 2023
34%66%<1%
2.56
Lusally Hong
3W–2L career · no lines in 2023
0%92%8%
2.30

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.