Teams

HARRIS/18/7.5/NOD/NOCC

2025 NO Southern Combo 18 & Over - Women Day · 7.5 NO (18&O) Women Day

13 players · average NTRP 3.62 / LOUISIANA

View scouting list →
Schedule2 played
2025-09-23vs Saizon/18/7.5/NOD/AUDLost 03
L#1 DoublesHelen Jenkins / Jeanne Swingle vs Elizabeth Stirling / Stacey Bosco6-1, 4-6, 0-1
L#2 DoublesHolly Gordon / Mariann Wilson vs Paige Saizon / Julie Steigner1-6, 6-7
L#3 DoublesStacy Head / Tracy Mason vs Liz Appelbaum / Pam Vitrano0-6, 3-6
2025-08-26vs Saizon/18/7.5/NOD/AUDLost 12
L#1 DoublesStacey Lacour / Linda Miller vs Paige Saizon / Jennifer Perilloux2-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesBoo Charbonnet / Christine Kelleher vs Elizabeth Stirling / Amanda Seale4-6, 4-6
W#3 DoublesHelen Jenkins / Tracy Mason vs Julie Steigner / Paige Giavotella6-2, 5-7, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 7.5 NO (18&O) Women Day have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.37 estimated across 12 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.89
Caroline Wolfe
published 4
3.83
Helen Jenkins
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
3.57
Jeanne Swingle
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
3.53
Stacy Head
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
3.41
Christine Kelleher
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.38
Boo Charbonnet
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.29
Stacey Lacour
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.27
Henriette Harris
published
3.22
Catherine Hales
published 3.5
3.18
Holly Gordon
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
2.94
Tracy Mason
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
2.90
Mariann Wilson
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Paige Morrison
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Christine Kelleher + Stacey Lacour3259% games+8.8% vs expected
Henriette Harris + Boo Charbonnet2348% games−1.3% vs expected
Stacey Lacour + Boo Charbonnet4149% games−3.4% vs expected
Holly Gordon + Mariann Wilson213 matchesnot enough data
Christine Kelleher + Boo Charbonnet213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Caroline Wolfe
11W–3L career · no lines in 2025
<1%78%22%
3.89
Helen Jenkins
10W–13L career · 2 lines in 2025
1%88%12%
3.83
Jeanne Swingle
33W–7L career · 3 lines in 2025
<1%30%70%
3.57
Stacy Head
1W–7L career · 1 line in 2025
42%58%<1%
3.53
3.5
Christine Kelleher
10W–8L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%74%26%
3.41
3.5
Boo Charbonnet
17W–11L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%80%19%
3.38
Stacey Lacour
12W–8L career · 1 line in 2025
2%91%7%
3.29
Henriette Harris
11W–10L career · no lines in 2025
3%92%5%
3.27
3.5
Catherine Hales
4W–3L career · no lines in 2025
5%92%2%
3.22
Holly Gordon
8W–2L career · 1 line in 2025
10%89%1%
3.18
Tracy Mason
7W–10L career · 2 lines in 2025
67%33%<1%
2.94
Mariann Wilson
4W–10L career · 1 line in 2025
76%24%<1%
2.90
Paige Morrison
10W–9L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.