Teams

SDNC LLW 3.5 Kit Carson Park/ Warren

2022 Adult 18 & Over Spring - SDNC · SDNC - Men - 3.5

7 players · average NTRP 3.67 / SAN DIEGO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
W#2 DoublesBrandon Szeto / Mark Rezac vs Christopher Nero / Alex Schardt6-4, 6-4
W#2 SinglesCarlos Auyon vs Jonathan Roth6-4, 7-5
L#2 DoublesJeffrey Felix / Robert Alpert vs Juancho Eekhout / Andre Freund4-6, 6-2, 0-1
2022-05-29Won 20
W#1 DoublesJeffrey Felix / Jeffrey Haar vs Mark Noet / Tim Miller6-0, 6-2
W#1 SinglesCarlos Auyon vs Jamie Lemon6-4, 6-3
W#2 SinglesMark Rezac vs Stanford Yee7-6, 4-6, 1-0
2022-05-08vs SDNC 3.5 RSF TC/ Clotfelter (3:2)Won 21
W#1 DoublesNOREN HONDA / Jeffrey Felix vs Derek Clotfelter / Matias Clotfelter Bastias6-3, 7-6
W#2 DoublesGrigorii Evlantev / Mark Rezac vs Christopher Baker / Rick Lansley6-3, 6-0
L#2 SinglesCarlos Auyon vs James Pennington2-6, 7-5, 0-1
2022-04-24vs SDNC 3.5 RPTC/ Reyno (2:3)Won 30
W#1 DoublesJeffrey Felix / Robert Alpert vs Ronnie Reyno / Paul Russell6-3, 6-4
W#2 SinglesCarlos Auyon vs John Noerenberg6-3, 6-4
W#3 DoublesGrigorii Evlantev / Mark Rezac vs Rolando Cruz / Yi Zhang6-2, 6-0
W#2 DoublesJeffrey Felix / Robert Alpert vs Satish Jayanthi / Rohit Nair6-2, 6-3
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for SDNC - Men - 3.5 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.54 estimated across 6 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.85
Jason Hui
published
3.65
Nirav Desai
published
3.62
Mark Rezac
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published 4
3.44
Mark Warren
published
3.44
Jeffrey Felix
usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published 3.5
3.23
Carlos Auyon
usually #2 Singles 75%, also #1 Singles 25% · published 3.5
Robert Alpert
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Jeffrey Felix + Carlos Auyon213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Jason Hui
12W–7L career · no lines in 2022
<1%87%13%
3.85
Nirav Desai
6W–12L career · no lines in 2022
12%88%<1%
3.65
4
Mark Rezac
87W–72L career · 4 lines in 2022
19%81%<1%
3.62
Mark Warren
15W–0L career · no lines in 2022
<1%67%33%
3.44
3.5
Jeffrey Felix
115W–73L career · 5 lines in 2022
<1%68%32%
3.44
3.5
Carlos Auyon
60W–35L career · 4 lines in 2022
4%94%2%
3.23
Robert Alpert
3W–0L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.