Teams

HEB - Bianca

2025 Valley Adult 18 & Over 2.5 W- 5.0 W - Spring · 3.5 Women

11 players · average NTRP 3.40 / TEXAS

View scouting list →
Schedule2 played
W#1 DoublesVioleta Gamboa / Leticia Garcia vs Toni Ibarra / Natalie Leal6-1, 6-4
W#1 SinglesAdina Flores vs Laura Torres6-1, 6-1
W#2 DoublesJessica Perez / Cristina Estrella vs Elsie Kokal / Rosalie Elliff7-5, 6-3
W#2 SinglesDeidra Tafolla vs Caitlin Kemp6-0, 6-3
W#3 DoublesDeisy Perez / Leticia Sanchez vs Denise Williams / Lucinda Rosignol5-7, 6-0, 1-0
W#1 DoublesLeticia Garcia / Jessica Perez vs Susan Pockrus / Margo Russell6-3, 7-6
L#1 SinglesAdina Flores vs Toni Ibarra3-6, 7-5, 0-1
W#2 DoublesAnica Diaz / Hannah Diaz vs Elsie Kokal / Shannon Sparks6-0, 6-4
W#2 SinglesDeidra Tafolla vs Audrey Hooks3-6, 6-0, 1-0
L#3 DoublesCristina Estrella / Deisy Perez vs Paula Fields / Lucinda Rosignol1-6, 2-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 3.5 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.09 estimated across 7 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.33
Deidra Tafolla
usually #2 Singles 100% · published 3.5
3.29
Anica Diaz
usually #1 Doubles 44%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
Adina Flores
usually #1 Singles 100% · published 3.5
3.23
Leticia Sanchez
usually #2 Doubles 60%, also #3 Doubles 40% · published
3.12
Cristina Estrella
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
2.96
Krista Banuelos
usually #2 Doubles 75%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published
2.93
Eva Chipps
published
Deisy Perez
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Singles 50% · published 3
2.74
Kristen Resendez
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Jessica Perez
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
Violeta Gamboa
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Cristina Estrella + Krista Banuelos6069% games+2.0% vs expected
Leticia Sanchez + Cristina Estrella123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Deidra Tafolla
13W–8L career · 2 lines in 2025
1%88%11%
3.33
3.5
Anica Diaz
29W–25L career · 9 lines in 2025
2%91%7%
3.29
3.5
Adina Flores
3W–2L career · 2 lines in 2025
not enough data
Leticia Sanchez
13W–28L career · 5 lines in 2025
5%92%3%
3.23
3.5
Cristina Estrella
22W–12L career · 8 lines in 2025
19%80%<1%
3.12
Krista Banuelos
16W–15L career · 4 lines in 2025
<1%60%40%
2.96
Eva Chipps
5W–30L career · no lines in 2025
68%32%<1%
2.93
3
Deisy Perez
4W–5L career · 8 lines in 2025
not enough data
Kristen Resendez
8W–6L career · 3 lines in 2025
4%92%3%
2.74
Jessica Perez
4W–5L career · 6 lines in 2025
not enough data
Violeta Gamboa
3W–1L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.