Teams

OC CMTC - Ruben - Sun11

2026 USTA Mixed Doubles 18 & Over - OC · OC 10.0 WE - Weekend Mixed Doubles

15 players · average NTRP 5.00 / SO.CALIFORNIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule5 played
2026-03-21vs OC LPC - Ruben - Sat3Lost 12
W#1 DoublesAki Eguchi / Rafael Nieto vs Sean Robles / Emily Wu6-3, 3-6, 1-0
L#2 DoublesMichelle Hay / Paulo Sicangco vs Cooper Bridge / Lauren Yoon2-6, 3-6
L#3 DoublesTatsuya Ishizuka / Chihiro Abiko vs Kristine Kouyoumjian / Kyle Vo6-7, 4-4
2026-03-15vs OC LLW LNRC - AviLost 02
L#1 DoublesJacky Visava / Talia Lieb vs Maggie Mello Harrah / Hermont Legaspi1-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesAki Eguchi / Daniel Keolasy vs Akshit Nisha Anish / Erynne Mercado2-6, 4-6
2026-02-22vs OC LPC - Ruben - Sat3Lost 01
L#2 DoublesTalia Lieb / Francesco Nguyen vs Dianne Matias / Kyle Vo2-6, 3-6
2026-02-15vs OC LLW LNRC - AviLost 02
L#1 DoublesJacky Visava / Megan Heneghan vs Chris Lee / Erynne Mercado6-7, 4-6
L#2 DoublesTalia Lieb / Zachary Anderson vs Abhishek Nisha Anish / Jennifer Dubow3-6, 2-6
2026-01-25vs OC LaHabra TC - Leonard - Sun2Lost 12
W#1 DoublesTatsuya Ishizuka / Chihiro Abiko vs Jamie Wei / Proyfon Lohaphaisan7-5, 2-6, 1-0
L#2 DoublesAki Eguchi / Paulo Sicangco vs Gordon Tak Yin Hong / Karen Trinh2-6, 2-6
L#3 DoublesTalia Lieb / Zachary Anderson vs Michael Riechmann / Lisa Nguyen6-1, 3-6, 0-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings3 teams · OC 10.0 WE - Weekend Mixed Doubles
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1OC LLW LNRC - Avi6014411130
2OC LPC - Ruben - Sat32471124171
3OC CMTC - Ruben - Sun110631531197

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 4.58 estimated across 11 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.91
Ruben Alberts
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
4.87
Chihiro Abiko
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 5
4.79
Talia Lieb
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published
4.77
Christine Blair
usually #3 Doubles 80%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published
4.74
Bridget Etchegaray
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 5
4.71
Daniel Keolasy
usually #2 Doubles 43%, also #1 Doubles 29% · published 5
4.57
Aki Eguchi
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 5
4.54
Jacky Visava
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 17% · published
4.51
Tatsuya Ishizuka
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
4.27
Francesco Nguyen
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published
3.74
Michelle Hay
usually #1 Doubles 40%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published
Megan Heneghan
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Paulo Sicangco
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Rafael Nieto
usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #3 Doubles 40% · published
So-Young Walsh
published
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Ruben Alberts
9W–2L career · 1 line in 2026
no projection at this level
4.91
5
Chihiro Abiko
4W–4L career · 2 lines in 2026
no projection at this level
4.87
Talia Lieb
3W–6L career · 4 lines in 2026
no projection at this level
4.79
Christine Blair
4W–7L career · 5 lines in 2026
no projection at this level
4.77
5
Bridget Etchegaray
1W–3L career · 3 lines in 2026
no projection at this level
4.74
5
Daniel Keolasy
14W–15L career · 7 lines in 2026
no projection at this level
4.71
5
Aki Eguchi
166W–100L career · 3 lines in 2026
no projection at this level
4.57
Jacky Visava
9W–8L career · 6 lines in 2026
no projection at this level
4.54
Tatsuya Ishizuka
5W–13L career · 2 lines in 2026
no projection at this level
4.51
Francesco Nguyen
7W–12L career · 4 lines in 2026
no projection at this level
4.27
Michelle Hay
2W–7L career · 5 lines in 2026
<1%4%96%
3.74
Megan Heneghan
1W–1L career · 1 line in 2026
not enough data
Paulo Sicangco
0W–2L career · 2 lines in 2026
not enough data
Rafael Nieto
15W–6L career · 5 lines in 2026
not enough data
So-Young Walsh
1W–4L career · no lines in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.