Teams

KY/LEX/HOWARD/QUEEN

2025 USTA LEAGUE 18 & Over ADULT LEXINGTON · Women 3.5

17 players · average NTRP 3.33 / KENTUCKY

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule4 played
2025-03-14vs KY/LEX/SENTERS/KNIGHTSplit 22
W#1 DoublesRose Knight / Carlyn Moore vs Linn Jefferson / Margaret de Movellan6-2, 6-4
W#1 SinglesApril Russell vs Anne West6-1, 6-2
L#2 DoublesStephanie Queen / Erin Shetler vs Doris Senters / Melinda McClain2-6, 0-6
L#3 DoublesHolly Howard / Sarah Back vs Kirsten van Haaren / Mily Ralsten1-6, 1-6
2025-02-23vs KY/LEX/SENTERS/KNIGHTLost 23
L#1 DoublesRose Knight / Stephanie Queen vs Doris Senters / Sarah Knight6-2, 4-6, 0-1
W#1 SinglesJessie Vogt vs Mily Ralsten6-2, 2-6, 1-0
W#2 DoublesLiz Jameson / Trisha Atcher vs Lisa Castle / Margaret de Movellan6-0, 6-2
L#2 SinglesApril Russell vs Anne West4-6, 2-6
L#3 DoublesJulia Hutchens / Erin Shetler vs Cathy Corales / Jennifer Wilson6-2, 5-7, 0-1
2025-02-05vs KY/LEX/Morrow/PerniceLost 14
L#1 DoublesCarlyn Moore / Rose Knight vs Lucy Butt / Ruth Anna Swacker4-6, 3-6
L#1 SinglesErin Shetler vs Julia Hollon1-6, 0-6
L#2 DoublesSamantha Swentzel / Erin Stoffer vs Sarah Stykes / Sarah Delahanty2-6, 0-6
W#2 SinglesApril Russell vs Kathryn Kaufman6-4, 7-6
L#3 DoublesHolly Howard / Trisha Atcher vs Paige Bensing / Jennifer Strange5-7, 2-6
2025-01-14vs KY/LEX/Morrow/PerniceLost 23
W#1 DoublesJordan Reeves / Erin Azbell vs Sarah Delahanty / Cynthia Yeiser6-3, 7-5
L#1 SinglesJessie Vogt vs Paige Bensing6-7, 6-7
L#2 DoublesCarlyn Moore / Erin Stoffer vs Lucy Butt / Ruth Anna Swacker0-6, 2-6
L#2 SinglesStephanie Queen vs Emily Pernice3-6, 3-6
W#3 DoublesSamantha Swentzel / Lauren Saini vs Jennifer Strange / Laura Singler5-7, 6-4, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Women 3.5 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.14 estimated across 17 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.66
Erin Azbell
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
3.37
Erin Stoffer
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published
3.34
Jordan Reeves
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
3.32
Rose Knight
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.26
Jessie Vogt
usually #1 Singles 100% · published
3.23
Trisha Atcher
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
3.19
Samantha Swentzel
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
3.13
Carlyn Moore
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.12
Stephanie Queen
usually #1 Doubles 33%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
3.11
Lauren Saini
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published
3.10
Amy Bain
published 3.5
3.07
Liz Jameson
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.05
Sarah Back
usually #2 Doubles 33%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
2.99
April Russell
usually #2 Singles 43%, also #1 Singles 43% · published 3
2.94
Holly Howard
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
2.91
Natalie Carlisle
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
2.58
Erin Shetler
usually #1 Singles 40%, also #3 Doubles 20% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Erin Azbell + Jordan Reeves15361% games+11.2% vs expected
Rose Knight + Stephanie Queen2451% games+2.6% vs expected
Trisha Atcher + Holly Howard1443% games−7.0% vs expected
Carlyn Moore + Erin Stoffer224 matchesnot enough data
Rose Knight + Holly Howard123 matchesnot enough data
April Russell + Jessie Vogt123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Erin Azbell
23W–7L career · 3 lines in 2025
13%86%1%
3.66
Erin Stoffer
18W–14L career · 4 lines in 2025
<1%83%17%
3.37
Jordan Reeves
17W–4L career · 3 lines in 2025
87%13%<1%
3.34
Rose Knight
8W–19L career · 3 lines in 2025
1%89%10%
3.32
Jessie Vogt
6W–7L career · 2 lines in 2025
3%93%4%
3.26
Trisha Atcher
5W–6L career · 2 lines in 2025
5%92%3%
3.23
Samantha Swentzel
1W–7L career · 2 lines in 2025
9%90%1%
3.19
3.5
Carlyn Moore
12W–33L career · 3 lines in 2025
18%81%<1%
3.13
Stephanie Queen
4W–15L career · 3 lines in 2025
19%80%<1%
3.12
Lauren Saini
12W–9L career · 4 lines in 2025
21%78%<1%
3.11
3.5
Amy Bain
15W–19L career · no lines in 2025
25%75%<1%
3.10
Liz Jameson
9W–7L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%30%70%
3.07
Sarah Back
13W–9L career · 3 lines in 2025
<1%36%64%
3.05
3
April Russell
50W–37L career · 7 lines in 2025
<1%54%46%
2.99
Holly Howard
4W–13L career · 2 lines in 2025
66%34%<1%
2.94
Natalie Carlisle
7W–4L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%74%26%
2.91
Erin Shetler
9W–21L career · 5 lines in 2025
29%71%<1%
2.58

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.