← Teams

WHRC-Leong/Chong

2019 Adult 40 & Over · 3.5 Women

8 players · average NTRP 3.71 · USTA/PACIFIC NW / NORTHERN OREGON

View scouting list →
Scouting

Roster averages 3.34 estimated across 7 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.73
Mary Lowblad
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #2 Singles 17% · published 4
3.60
Erika Finrow
usually #1 Singles 80%, also #2 Singles 20% · published 4
3.57
Robby Lafleur
usually #3 Doubles 47%, also #2 Doubles 27% · published 4
3.24
Nancy Collins
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
3.24
Laura Maginnis
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.01
Ann Kitchen
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.00
Wendy Nakatani
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
—
June Fernandez
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 0
Results8 ties
2019-06-21Won 3–1
L#1 DoublesJune Fernandez / Nancy Collins vs Heike Droste / Jennifer Kuhr6-1, 3-6, 1-0
W#1 SinglesErika Finrow vs Kimiko Kotsugi6-0, 6-1
W#2 DoublesMary Lowblad / Ann Kitchen vs Lala Climaco / Ellen Hodges6-1, 6-4
W#3 DoublesLinda Frank / Wendy Nakatani vs N/A6-0, 6-0
2019-06-15Split 2–2
L#1 DoublesKate Leatherbarrow / Laura Maginnis vs Amy Murphy / Kayleen Mendenhall6-2, 6-0
W#1 SinglesErika Finrow vs Nancy Stecher6-2, 6-0
L#2 DoublesRobby Lafleur / Shannon Berry vs Sharon Vipond / Kathy Schaub6-4, 3-6, 1-0
W#3 DoublesLoo Yah Leong / Mary Lowblad vs Chrys Culver / Gina Meyer7-5, 5-7, 1-0
2019-06-08Won 2–1
L#1 DoublesWendy Nakatani / Ann Kitchen vs Ariana White / Holly Kanz6-1, 6-2
W#1 SinglesMary Lowblad vs Kimberly Parks6-2, 7-6
W#3 DoublesKate Leatherbarrow / Nancy Collins vs Michelle Robbins / Melissa Smith6-4, 6-1
2019-06-07Won 2–1
W#1 SinglesErika Finrow vs Stephanie Paulson6-3, 6-1
L#2 DoublesMary Lowblad / Wendy Nakatani vs Shannon Lofton / Kristin Lyman7-5, 3-6, 1-0
W#3 DoublesNancy Collins / Tina Chong vs Rozita Walsh / Kathy Schaub6-4, 6-3
2019-05-31Won 2–1
W#1 SinglesErika Finrow vs Jill Huffman6-3, 6-2
L#2 DoublesLoo Yah Leong / Wendy Nakatani vs Paula Jacobson / Janine Wood6-1, 6-2
W#3 DoublesRobby Lafleur / Terry Mettler vs Kathy Ramsey / Julie Trujillo7-5, 6-1
2019-05-19Won 3–0
W#1 DoublesLaura Maginnis / Lisa Symmonds vs Heike Droste / Jennifer Kuhr6-4, 6-3
W#2 DoublesMary Lowblad / Ann Kitchen vs Ellen Hodges / Laurie Horenstein6-4, 6-0
W#3 DoublesJune Fernandez / Linda Frank vs Jeny Joseph / Lala Climaco6-4, 6-4
2019-05-10Lost 1–2
L#2 DoublesTerry Mettler / Robby Lafleur vs Patricia Board / Elizabeth Domagalski6-3, 6-3
W#2 SinglesErika Finrow vs Michelle Dombek4-6, 6-2, 1-0
L#3 DoublesJune Fernandez / Linda Frank vs Shamera Daugherty / Kim Christensen6-3, 6-1
2019-05-04Split 2–2
L#1 DoublesJune Fernandez / Nancy Collins vs Terry Folen / Wendy Weddle4-6, 7-6, 1-0
W#2 DoublesRobby Lafleur / Terry Mettler vs Stacey Burkhart / Mary Logsdon6-0, 6-2
L#2 SinglesMary Lowblad vs Deborah Naugler6-4, 7-6
W#3 DoublesLisa Symmonds / Laura Maginnis vs Blythe Knott / Traci Laurent6-1, 6-3
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits.

4
Mary Lowblad
123W–61L career
4%95%1%
3.73
4
Erika Finrow
45W–25L career
24%75%1%
3.60
4
Robby Lafleur
53W–48L career
22%78%0%
3.57
3.5
Nancy Collins
54W–27L career
2%98%0%
3.24
3.5
Laura Maginnis
82W–48L career
4%95%1%
3.24
3.5
Ann Kitchen
27W–36L career
33%67%0%
3.01
3.5
Wendy Nakatani
30W–41L career
36%64%0%
3.00
0
June Fernandez
12W–7L career
not enough data
—

Three percentages are the year-end projection — chance of moving down, staying, moving up — and the number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.